[ad_1]
December 7 and 20 – Mr. Nipit Intharasombat, Deputy Leader of the Democratic Party Posted on Facebook, analysis of the verdict on Mr. Thanathorn’s younger brother Therefore prosperity The content is as follows: This period has reviews / comments. On the verdict in the bribery case of royal property officials And has a younger brother, Mr. Thanathorn So prosperity Wrapped in
The Criminal Court has ruled. Red Or Tor Case Number 228/2562, Nov 27, 2019, Imprisonment for Crown Property Officer AND Related Persons Suspicions Why Mr. Thanathorn Therefore Not Being Sued
I have read the verdict several times and have the following academic opinions.
1. According to the indictment and the original sentence, the court used the words “Property Office, Mr. Sakulthorn Therefore prosperity AND the people are the victims”, so upon learning that Mr. Sakulthorn was deceived by the Officials therefore believed that the documents that came out of the property office is the real document. In fact, the documents that came out were false documents, so Sakulthorn was also a scam. Now, Mr. Sakulthorn is still just a victim and has done nothing wrong.
2. But when Mr. Sakulthorn Be deceived by false documents Later, Mr. Sakulthorn Then I wanted to rent that land But “he wants to rent without auction in the normal process”, so he pays through the intermediary in 3 installments for a amount of 20 million baht. The word Mr. Sakulthon is the victim now, so you can hear that Mr. Sakulthon gives money to officials for bribes without wanting to bid in the usual way. “The two defendants came together as intermediaries to demand bribes.” That is, money, bribes, so that you don’t have to bid in the usual way. So I have a legal opinion that
1. The prosecutor must clarify that At the end of the indictment and trial the payment of 20 million did not specify that Sakulthon was the victim for the longest time, but could be heard that he contributed this amount. For bribery of officials, why did the prosecutor not report the accusations of Mr. Sakulthon? Along with bribery officials, will this repeat the Red Bull case?
2. Property Office Property Has operated this matter with serious transparency It is considered appropriate that the “Popular Party” admires a certain transparency and considers it a reform of the monarchy. And it is a reform that does not require that anyone get together and demand If we do not have prejudices Or have hidden intentions in other matters I hope to receive some praise from the “people” and the protesters. A little bit is still okay.
[ad_2]
