[ad_1]
The NACC reiterates M.112 to adhere to the NCCC regime with the King as Head of State
Date Dec 11, 2020 at 9:41 AM.
Democratic Party Spokesperson reiterates Party’s commitment to democracy With the King as Head of State for protection, Section 112
On December 11, 63, Mr. Ramesh Ratanachaweng, spokesman for the Democratic Party cited cases in which the protesters demanded the modification of article 112 of the Penal Code so that the party adheres to a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State. And a country governed by law A demonstration calling for democracy But what is the real intention? I thought everyone knew. The purpose of using words that the Thai people cannot accept with actions In the last case of the question of the repeal of Article 112, everyone knows the intentions of the protesters that Article 112 is an obstacle to the main purpose of the Assembly.
Mr. Rames went on to say that the reason for the need for Article 112 of the Penal Code was to be in line with the head and institutional protection of the King of Thailand. Determination of the penalty for offenders It is for public order and good customs according to the rule of law, morals or ethics of the law. Article 112 of the Penal Code is neither contrary nor incompatible with the rule of law and it is not unconstitutional. But resent those who think badly of the institution, thus wanting to cancel Section 112
Article 112 of the Penal Code is in the first category of crimes related to the security of the Kingdom, Chapter 1, crimes against the king, the queen, the heir apparent and the regent.
That it is a state measure that aims to protect the monarchy From defame, insult or show malice The offense of section 112 of the Penal Code would have an impact on the security of the state. Because the King is an institution that the constitution provides, endorses and protects AND is part of a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State of Thailand. Article 112 of the Penal Code contains the provisions of the law on the security of the Kingdom. It is a generally used arrangement. It is not intended to apply to any particular case or person. And it does not affect the essence of the freedom of expression of the constitution in any way, because everyone still has the freedom to express opinions whose scope is not a crime according to article 112 of the Penal Code.
The Penal Code, Section 112, is not a problem as the protesters pervert. By inviting brave parliamentarians to submit their names to propose amendments to Article 112 to the House of Commons, no political party can be banned from doing so. As for the Democratic Party, there is a clear principle of adherence to a democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State.
Rames said that the Democratic Party side had no idea to repeal Article 112, which supports strict application of the law.
[ad_2]
