‘Looking to the future’ confirms the prime minister’s cleaning motion Does not affect the institution



[ad_1]

January 28, 2021


33

The opposition calls a “step forward” proposal to discuss the prime minister’s goal. It does not affect the institution

After Mr. Sira Jane Jakha, MP from Bangkok, Palang Pracharat Party Discussed the results of the tripartite discussion on the amendment of the distrustful debate motion More recently, Mr. Sompong Amornwat, leader of the Pheu Thai Party. As leader of the opposition in the House of Representatives Reveal clarity in such cases that it was revealed that he could not say whether the motion would be amended or not. Inviting the boss The leaders of the opposition party meet to discuss in his office at 4:00 pm

Then opposition party leaders such as Mr. Sompong, Pheu Thai Party leader, Mr. Prasert Chantrarawongthong, Pheu Thai Party Secretary, Pol. Prachachat Party, Mr. Wirat Worasirin, list of deputies The Party Thai Liberal Mr. Khicharn Chaowaphatthanawong and Ms. Sirikanya Tansakul, MPs from the Kao Klai Party list, attended the meeting.

Later, Mr. Phichin Chaowaphatthanawong, Sen. Deputy Party Leader Kao Klai said that Mr. Clarified the opposition party’s no-confidence motion Can be returned to be modified or not modified How is the Council Chairman? In fact, such a motion is not inaccurate or incorrect, although Mr. Wirat Ratanaset, Prime Minister, is concerned, the words written in the motion may be too harsh. But the opposition explained that We try to point out that How does the prime minister behave? As it is written in the motion It will be discussed carefully The least mention of the institution AND as necessary

But when there was an unrest, Sompong, as the leader of the opposition Therefore, representatives of the opposition party were invited to discuss and listen to the opinions of all parties. We’d love to hear the reasons and the results on how to have common ground.

Asked if the opinion of the majority of the opposition parties would like to be reviewed. What would the party say? Mr. Khicharn said If all words were raised I think that would not happen. Because this proposition was expressed through AND the joint opposition party signed together But there will be some adjustments But still receiving the message according to the original reasoning principles, it may be possible

When asked about the case of 2 deputies not signing proposals to amend Section 112 of the Penal Code, Hearing said. This matter has not been discussed with the 2 deputies. Because 1 in 2 MPs did not attend a meeting with the party. You may not hear some words completely That we have not repealed Article 112 But on this matter we would discuss together again.

[ad_2]