[ad_1]
“Jurin” insists that the NACC voted against, proposing to the court to interpret the draft amendment to the Constitution. Do not ask to interfere with the opinions of other parties.
On December 1, in parliament, Jurin Laksanawisit, leader of the Democratic Party (PACC), Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Commerce, gave an interview on the question of asking parliament to pass a resolution asking the Constitutional Court to decide. On the duties and powers of Congress today that Democrats do not agree to make a presentation. Which is clearly a party resolution at the MPC meeting on December 1, for an important reason is Before we have signed a draft amendment to the coalition government, it has become clear that A constitutional body Y thinks that everyone’s expectations the parties involved I would like the constitutional amendment to go smoothly and that it can actually be amended. There should be no problem or obstacle causing the feeling that there is another obstacle. But by submitting to the Constitutional Court, it is feared that it will distract society as to whether the coalition government’s part of the bill is intended to be amended or not. As for the Democrats, it was clear that we did not agree to present again to the Constitutional Court that Constitutional or not. Furthermore, last week there was a resolution accepting the principles of Agenda 1 and the Extraordinary Commissioner was appointed to consider it.
Following the question of whether to be accused of Party Deputies or not Who can have some votes to vote in addition to the party Have agreed The leader of the Democratic Party said that everyone has a duty to follow the party’s resolutions. Last time she had invited him to warn her. And he has warned everyone This time, it was not seen that anyone would disagree with the party’s resolution.
The reporter asked In addition to voting today, the party deputies will have a debate to invite Do the parliamentarians vote in the same direction or not? Mr. Jurin replied that we are doing our duty. On the Democratic side, because when the government has been flogged, it has decided to give free votes. But the Democrats are not free to vote. As for the Democrats, it was clear that we did not agree to submit to the Constitutional Court. And each party may have discretion to make a decision in its own opinion. We would not go to fight.
For December 2 to have a decision of the Constitutional Court What may affect the performance of Prime Minister Jurin said this was not predictable. Because the decision of the Constitutional Court would not have known in advance You must request to be subject to the decision of the court that will have a decision And you did not prepare in advance? Today, Prayut is still the prime minister.
