[ad_1]
It will not end! The daughter-in-law filed 3 lawsuits against her parents. Even having to sign Ungrateful daughter-in-law Revealing only one case to withdraw Parents seemed willing to forgive. If the case ends, the estate will be divided.
Stay on top of the news Press to follow the live news line.
On February 16, 1964, journalists reported on the progress of 84-year-old Mr. Jiu, with his wife installing large posters with photos of him and his wife. In front of the gas station A PTT in Uthai Thani province With the message saying “Justice is real. Land and the Lan Sak PTT bomb belong to Mr. Jiu-Nang Noi (father-mother), ungrateful daughter-in-law. No right to any kind “to protect and claim their rights After the eldest son and daughter-in-law collected the rent from the land. Both are their own businesses Before suing to recover all the assets of the eldest son Worth hundreds of millions of baht
Most recently, during the last call, Mr. Jiu was 84 years old, Ms. Noi, his wife, along with Mr. Somsak Thanomwajaman, a personal lawyer. He traveled to the Uthai Thani Provincial Court to rehear the court hearing From the case of a daughter-in-law (Wife of the eldest son) filed a lawsuit to evict Mr. Jiu from the gas station. Today, the court appointment to examine the proposal But in the problem that the daughter-in-law did not travel to hear this time Assigning a defense lawyer Act in the case
Mr. Somsak, Mr. Chew’s personal attorney, revealed that the daughter-in-law demanded the expulsion of Mr. Jiu. The attorney was assigned from the petition to the court requesting that the lawsuit be dropped in the eviction case. Where all lawsuits have been filed, there are 3 cases and all cases are likely to be dropped. Both Eviction Lawsuits Request for Dissolution of Lan Sak Phonthawee Pump Partnership
Regarding the case in which Mr. Jiu sued his son and daughter-in-law to claim the property In which Mr. Ji won the case On appeal in the Bangkok court AND the defendant who is the daughter-in-law requests an extension The appeal is scheduled to end on February 29, 64, and if no appeal has been filed. Assume the case is over
Mr. Jiu said that he had previously been informed by lawyers that he would withdraw all cases. But the daughter-in-law only withdraws one case, the eviction case, but the case against the company has not been withdrawn. Without knowing the intention of his daughter-in-law, because 3 cases were to be withdrawn for a single case AND he wanted his son and daughter-in-law to come back and talk to him. But still he refused to speak And from the time they were published until they made the news, they have never spoken
Even before this for over 2 years he never saw his face. We never contact the one they want their children to talk to. To end the story Because the father and mother are always willing to forgive their children. As for the properties, if the case ends, no appeal will be filed. Ready to assign a new serving Divide it among the 3 children again. With justice and equality for all
[ad_2]
