[ad_1]
Fire 9 former leaders of people who want to vote Skywalk Rally
Date Dec 25, 2020 at 11:40 am
The criminal court dismisses the former leader of nine electoral groups. Skywalk rallies say it’s not incitement.
On December 25, 2020 at the Bangkok South Criminal Court The court reads the verdict, Black Case No. 3207/2561 at the Bangkok South Criminal Office Prosecutor’s Office. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against a political activist and former leader of nine electoral groups as a defendant for inciting provocation. According to article 116 of the Penal Code, a public assembly was organized within a 150-meter radius of the Royal Palace in accordance with the Public Assemblies Law of 2015 and violated the Head of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO). ) 3/2558, Article 12 prohibits political gatherings of 5 or more people (the order has been canceled)
Defendants 1-9 consisted of Mr. Weera Somkid, General Secretary of the Anti-Corruption People Network, Mr. Rangsiman Rome, MP, the Kao Klai Party List, Mr. Sirawit Serithivat or Ja New Ms. Nattha Mahattana or Bow, Mr. Anon Nampha, the national leader in 2020, Mr. Ekachai Hongkangwan, Mr. Sukrit Piensuwan, Mr. Natiwit Chotiphatpaisarn and Mr. Sombat Boonngam Anong or land. Moles.
Starting with the case of January 27, 2018, the defendants organized an activity “Stop buying elections. Stop inheriting power” to point out to the NCPO that the people do not want the elections to be postponed again. At the Sky Walk Pathumwan intersection in front of the MBK Center, all defendants denied and received bail. When the appointment time The defendant gradually came to court. The court examined the evidence that the plaintiff and the defendant had testified, and the nine defendants committed an offense of gathering within 150 meters of the Royal Palace under the Public Assembly Law Within 150 meters until it was carried out measurement after AND there are no signs prohibiting mounting. The nine defendants and the public do not know that the assembly is prohibited. Also in front of the Bangkok Art and Culture Center which is closer than the scene, there are frequent events. Make the accused understand that he is not in the prohibitions He believes that the 9 accused have no intention of violating The testimony of the applicant was not enough to hear that the 9 accused committed this crime. The 9 defendants committed the crime of inciting the state According to the Penal Code, Art. 116 or not from interviews with defendants 1 and 9, holding a poster and talking about the defendants 6 and the speech of the defendants. There is a call for elections to be held in November 2018, as Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha has postponed multiple elections. Even if the speeches convey meaning But not wanting to postpone an election is not an incitement. According to the purpose of the Constitution, the speeches and interviews of the accused did not go so far as to incite harshness among the people. The plaintiff’s witnesses had no weight to hear that the defendant committed a crime under Section 116 of the Penal Code.
Photo @ TLHR2014
[ad_2]
