[ad_1]
February 25, 2016 – Mr. Kaew San Atipho posted an article on “DPW Criminal Court Cases Report” via www.thaipost.net With details as follows
Q. How did the professor fall into the defendant in the NCPO case? Just do it on stage
Respond to the theories of DSI and prosecutors under political command at the time Using the theory of Mao Kheng Who has made as Alliance, PDRC The size of the musicians rose to the stage of the alliance in Suvarnabhumi Still being sued for supporting terrorism PDRC has committed a crime Because the message made Uncle Suthep’s breath
Q. How did the court decide on this issue?
Answer: When the court refuses to charter the basket as presented I was only responsible for my stage, so I dropped the case. As for the leaders themselves, they are responsible for different karmas, only for the part they do. Even if you see the same penalty, someone is different. It is true that the court rejected Mao Kheng’s theory in this way. Investigator and prosecutor remember. Three Fingered Mafia Cases You shouldn’t do this again.
Ask the teacher, do you feel that Made for the nation to expel evil from the country Why are you in jail like this?
M: I am very sorry for the friend of the main defendant. Personally, I am not happy that the court dismissed the lawsuit because it knew that there is nothing to punish me. I only made a speech for one reason. Regarding the legal idea I still believe that the case can be reversed in the appellate class. If the Court of Appeal agrees with the “right to protect the Constitution of the NCPO” in the 2007 Constitution, provided in Section 69 that
Article 69.- Every person shall have the right to oppose by peaceful means any act that allows him to obtain the power to govern the country by means that do not conform to the course provided in this Constitution.
Asked, seen at the trial, he accepted it, right? We are exercising our right to a peaceful assembly. And the right to protect the constitution
Answer: Start in advance that we have the right But after that, confirm every time you make a mistake on every counter that “Basic rights cannot be excluded from committing an illegal act.” That typifies various legal offenses He pounced on the leader and caused chaos. Obstruction of elections Government office raid Inciting government officials to stop working, and there were two counts of treason and terrorism, which was dropped because he saw that he did not fit in with the elements. Not because they have the power to act in accordance with the right to protect the constitution
Q. How do you appeal the sentence of the Criminal Court?
Answer: I have to appeal both issues.
1. Appeal that our actions do not constitute a crime. For example, entering the Ministry of Finance to persuade officials to take a break alone is not an invasion of possession, etc. Here they are fighting according to the evidence.
2. Appeal that we are not guilty because we have the power to do so under section 69 to protect the constitution. We do not take the fundamental right to the exclusion of crimes as understood by the first court, but we insist that we have the power to defend the Constitution. It’s like using the right to protect ourselves, picking up a gun and shooting a gangster who will ever stab our children. In this defense, there are no other cases like us.
What other cases do you ask?
Responding to the case of the NACC to evict the government of Prime Minister Abhisit Without this right Because the government of Abhisit does not damage the constitution Regarding the case of the allies during the uprising to expel the Thaksin regime The threat of the Thaksin regime not yet it is clear and constitutional like the PDRC case, even more so in the case of the three-fingered mafia. The monarchy is even more harmless.
Q. In the era of the PDRC, is the Thaksin regime already a mature threat?
Answer: 2 times the party was dissolved, many cases of corruption, the court sanctioned, transferred relatives to occupy important positions until the court decided to revoke the appointment order, twice tried to amend the constitution to have absolute power, fled of the case abroad but they sent the youngest A woman becomes a puppet, illegally occupies Thai politics, is a parliamentary dictator, uses the majority of the majority for amnesty in cases of corruption for herself, etc. It was clear to the PDRC that the Thaksin regime was like a cobra that had fallen into the bedroom. He must hit, he must be fired When the court comes to punish us Then we disagree How can we go wrong torturing animals?
Ask the defense that the PDRC is chasing this cobra, right? That would be a great draw.
A. Yes, if the Superior Court admits that we have this right, we have the right to resist peacefully. The key weapon of peaceful resistance is the strike, so it is not wrong to invite government officials or workers to take a break. Both invading and inciting It is not wrong to block a peaceful election. It is suspected that it is beyond the reach of peaceful means. Just a few krathongs That can be punished under the law Like defending yourself unreasonably That’s still wrong but it can reduce the penalty.
Q. When will I appeal?
Please reply as soon as possible. Wait for Uncle Kamnan to get bail first
Why didn’t Uncle Kamnan and the eight people get insurance like the other 6 people who got insurance?
Answer this question, I really don’t understand. If it is a major case, severe punishment like the king of drugs. The court then asked the Supreme Court to order the insurance. So I have seen and can understand the reasons, but the Criminal Court is the main court in the country. Uncle Kamnan is only punished for 5 years, why was the Criminal Court not ordered? I don’t know your reason.
Q. When will the Court of Appeal order a request for bond? You must wait for us to appeal the case first or
A. Don’t wait. Order two days today.
Question: Does anyone think the court is ruthless to DPW by threatening a 3-inch case.
Answer, I don’t think so. I can think about it, but there is no chance of seeing it.
[ad_2]
