[ad_1]
February 4, 64 – Mr. Nanthiwat Samart, former deputy director of the National Intelligence Agency Post on facebook, topic “Objection to the amendment to article 112” with the following details
This will be the first time in history that members of the House of Representatives will make amendments to Section 112. With the reason that to reduce the problem of using Article 112 of the law as a tool for political harassment
The insults of the institute Coordinated like an orchestra Walk the game both in the council On the road and people outside the country
It confirms once again that it does not bring the crime to article 112 to compare it with ordinary criminal law. Because this section is intended to protect the King and the heir apparent AND have this type of law from RE127 (2453) after the change of government The Popular Party Constitution of 1932 has a provision to protect it.
The monarchy is the cornerstone of stability. It is the center of the mind and the nation. Only those who wish to overthrow the Institute tried to shake this pillar. With undermine
Section 112 doesn’t hurt anyone. If you do not intend to harass the institution The king is not a villager Not a politician He is not someone to be criticized. Criticism, without mentioning it, is not guilty. But someone wants to criticize the institute
Do not believe that people oppose or oppose institutional harassment. To recover or restore the integrity of the system Do not try to conjure Do not fear your shadow, do not go crazy.
The effort to amend article 112 is an attempt to allow public criticism of the Head of State. Without allowing any law to pass AND made it a crime under the defamation law, which is a civil crime. Low criminal penalties, imprisonment for up to 1 year, and if successfully resolved, those in charge of 112 cases will receive compensation. You will not have to go to jail due to the new laws that apply to you and the convict.
Anyone can know about this matter.
But it remains worrying that the deputies exercise their privilege to discuss the institutions in the council. With the monarch lured by a political game
He agreed with Dr. Warong on the name search. Object to the amendment to article 112.
[ad_2]
