“Ekachai” invaded the Election Commission by the state of “Phaiboon” the list of names in excess. Initial invocation



[ad_1]

“Ekachai” invaded the Election Commission by the state of “Phaiboon” the list of names in excess. Initial invocation

On December 14, 2020 at the Office of the Electoral Commission (Electoral Commission) Mr. Ekachai Hongkangwan Political activist As singer of the EC. Investigate the case Mr. Paiboon Nititawan He dissolved the People’s Reform Party and went to the Palang Pracharat Party. Consideration of the petition of the Electoral Commission has followed. After several attempts to make a phone call, no progress has been made. And the authorities tried to evade that. Such cases are the same as the Constitutional Court ruling to dissolve the New Future Party. And the innocent party members can find a new party to belong to

Follow the news, press follow the line fresh news
Add friend

With which I do not agree to compare the matter of Mr. Paiboon with such cases because The story of Mr. Paiboon It was the dissolution of the party itself. To belong to the Palang Pracharat Party Despite this party, deputies, the list of 150 people, according to the constitution,Mr. Paiboon is a member of the list of deputies of the People’s Reform Party. When the MPs have completed the Palang Pracharat Party list, will it reach number 151?

“At first I said that I would dismiss the petition for the story of Mr. Paiboon, just when the Constitutional Court ruled on the dissolution of the Future Forward Party But then he informed that he would take it to the great committee Recently, it was reported that it was pending consideration by the political party registrar. Like the Election Commissioner, trying to kick a counterweight due to archival issues since September 62 over the past year, it is far from clear. In this sense, I believe that the Electoral Commission has to submit to the Constitutional Court for a decision because it is not about a dissolution of the party. But it is characterized by a merger of the party which must be prohibited by the Law of Political Parties. “

The reporter reported that after the matter of Mr. Ekachai Today, no documents have been made, the official recommended that Mr. Ekachai inquire about the political party affairs officer, 6th floor of the Electoral Commission Office, to which the official explained that the matter presented will know the results within January. 64 causes Mr. Ekachai Expressing disappointment by stating that “When asked, he did not receive the application. Always postpone the time to give an answer.”



[ad_2]