[ad_1]
After “Sai Charoen Pura” and many others found a subpoena for 112 recent cases Sharing their experience when he was charged in Section 112
On December 18, 2020, Mr. Sombat Boonngam-anong posted a message through the Facebook page. Share the experience when charged in Section 112, as follows:
When I got to Section 112
In 1950 I went to a campaign not to accept the draft constitution in the Chiang Rai Transportation Company, the soldiers dragged me from the roof of the car and took me to detention in the military camp. A soldier in the position of Director of Intelligence of the Third Army Region examined me intensely, and put a lamp in his face as we see in the movies. Along with a phrase to remind you that “I will take on all legal crimes from your birth and also blame other family members, no matter what crimes I have committed.”
In 2014, I was detained again at the military camp for refusing to report to the NCPO. At first I thought they would just accuse me of not reporting, but they hit me with Section 112 and Section 116.
Oh, how did you not report to the NCPO? How did they hit you with Section 112? Confused? If you’re confused, go back to the topic that the Director of Intelligence threatened me in 1950.
There is a story that at the beginning of the year 2014, a man accused me of guilty, Section 112, for posting a photo of the UDPO leader. Do not sue Because the official sees that he does not enter Section 112, but because the office is located in the center of government That independent Buddhism was closed, causing the failure of the documentation process. My idioms remain there. Until he was arrested after the coup And an order to seek all the trials that existed to sue me
Now the official reported it. In this case, I have fought from the investigative officer level. Request for more additions until finally the Chief of Investigation, Roi Et Province Police Noncommissioned Officer There is an order not to prosecute Section 112, but the story is not over.
As I know, the NCPO ordered me. Freeze bank account I decided to sell rice with spots for 21 days and the police set up Warroom to get me out from the first day I started selling. How can I know? Because someone sitting in the Warroom made fun of me Until one day, polka dot rice was attacked by Seth Kai Ou, a spokesperson for the NCPO at the time said that polka dot rice was disrupting the mechanism of the Thai rice market.
A police officer called to meet him to discuss the spotted rice. I also let him know. The policeman told me that I should stop selling rice now. Because it has political consequences I told the police that if I broke the law on the sale of rice anywhere, I could report it. And the last sentence the police told me was “Trust me, you won’t be able to sell more polka dot rice.” Then it came out.
The next day, the police sent a letter signed by Major General Somyot Poompanmuang, Ph.D., who used to borrow money from the owner of the 300 million massage parlors. This book is The Letter Containing the Principal Investigator’s Opinion Counterclaim Order, Section 112. Finally, I decided to stop selling polka dot rice. Close the legend of the rice bag that finally destroys the mechanism of the Thai rice market.
I came here to say that they used Section 112 for political reasons. These people in military uniform brought weapons to the house where my daughter was. I took a military vehicle and waited for my daughter in front of the school and said that he would take me to receive a scholarship at the military camp. Such misery has been done before.
. 112 of the case the provincial prosecutor has no opinion to sue AND the District Attorney ordered not to close the case, Section 112 mine at the end
[ad_2]
