[ad_1]
The court postponed the evidence of the case “Dr. Seping” against “Man Khachai” against the defamation of Face Off surgery. Because the fifth defendant, the surgical victim, did not go to court. The other is abroad. The court reappointed him on February 22 of next year by allowing both parties to negotiate an agreement.
Today (November 16) in Judicial Chamber 907, Criminal Court, Ratchadapisek Road, the court is examining the evidence and examining the defendants. Black Case No. 1693/2019, Dr. Seping Chaiyasat, 47 years old, President of Face Off Cosmetic Surgery The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Mr. Kanchai Kamerdploy, or the young actor and presenter of the television program “Nhon Krai” in the Channel 3, Mr. Pinyo Phat Chittawan, Attorney, Ms. Pornthip Iamopas, Ms. Dawson, Ms. Phan Phakarawai, Ms. Pattanan In-Sa-ard and Ms. Prapaporn Bessdao, the surgical victims, are the defendants 1-7 as accused of public defamation. Which was filed as a civil case in connection with a criminal case to claim compensation of 50 million baht.
In this case, the plaintiff filed on July 3, 2019, stating that the plaintiff was the founder of the Face of Buy project. If someone is going to do it, it is recommended to do it with a standard hospital on April 4, 2019. Channel 3 broadcast the symptoms of the show “Part 2 Face Off Turning People to Ghost Face” with Mr. Kanchai as MC. Invite other defendants Come join the list of talking and questioning each other. It is planned to put the plaintiff. Although the plaintiff is anonymous, he uses a technique to name the title of the article in order to link it to the plaintiff. And he also took the news that Lieutenant General Surachet Hakphal issued a press release referring to the program. With the intention of making the plaintiff contemptuous, disrespectful, hated Therefore asked to be sanctioned for defamation When there is news and the program is broadcast This caused almost no one to use the Dr. Seping program or cancel all appointments. That the plaintiff plans to do business and will apply for deputies, but the reputation must come to an end. Therefore, he requested compensation of 50 million baht, which the court ordered to seal the case for consideration.
Dr. Seping, the plaintiff, and their attorney appeared in court today. While the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th defendants went to court with a lawyer, but the 5th and 6th defendants did not go to court at the appointed time. The attorney for the fifth defendant told the court that the fifth defendant could not be located, while the sixth defendant said that the sixth defendant had returned to work in the United States. Currently caught up in the COVID-19 situation. And he will be able to travel around April next year, so requesting that the case of the sixth defendant be temporarily ordered, the court asked the plaintiff’s lawyer and objected that the situation of the COVID-19 Unrolled Now he can travel to Thailand
The court found that the fifth defendant previously reported the home registration address in Phitsanulok province and has not yet changed the home registration in any way. Therefore, court officials must send the order to that house registration address again. And if there is no trustee, the order will be closed according to procedure. For the sixth defendant, the court sees that the COVID-19 situation is resolved, the sixth defendant can travel to Thailand, since the fifth defendant did not arrive at court today. Therefore, the appointment to verify evidence and retest the testimony of the accused on February 22, 2021 at 9:00 am, and since it is a case that citizens sued themselves, take this case also to the center of mediation.
After Mr. Kunchai or Num gave an interview to the media about the incident while they were meeting Dr. Seping in the room We did not speak to each other If you meet, raise your hand to show respect Confirm that the list of nodes current is really a voice for the public We are never from nowhere. Troubled people scream The task force was recruited to talk. He sat there for interviews like always. And wanting the parties to come in and clarify Confirm that it is not defamatory. He never hated or knew Dr. Seping. Why did you insult? In the context of the show that day, were there words outside the box to slander? Not sure Mediation is up to Dr. Seping. Anyway, he doesn’t like to trade. If you want to talk, let them know and talk to them, and if they are really wrong, be prepared to apologize to everyone. But what we are not wrong, we confirm that it is not bad. We have given Dr. Seping the opportunity to appear on the show for a long time. From the day the parties arrive at the show, we invite you to come out and clarify the facts. At that time, contacted, it was okay to be released, but it only took 2 days and they sued. I’m confused, I don’t know what to do
While in the morning before entering the exam room, Ms. Seping Chaisan, owner of the Town in Town plastic surgery clinic Interviewed who felt confident in all the tests and for the past 2 years, had been injured by reputation, unhappy and had never seen the faces of the 7 defendants today, so I wanted to see the expressions, eyes, feelings and understanding that Hurting others already has a conscience in the heart This unit of the jurisdiction trusts that justice is true. And society must know the facts. But if the accused is to mediate, they must first consider whether the accused has remorse or not. If the repentant is ready to forgive By having to apologize through the media Because he was acting through the media
Mr. Jamnong Chaimongkol, attorney Dr. Seping, said that today is the first appointment with the parties to examine the evidence, including an appointment for the cross-examination of witnesses. That the plaintiff had already testified on the investigation floor. The evidence in the way of the law is safe Because it was examined and it was found that it was actually spoken on the show. And words are the characteristics of inserting If it is about doing good or evil, why don’t you speak outside? But instead he spoke on the show to the public. And the facts presented have not been proven true or false. But even if the defendant’s information is factual, it is still considered defamatory. There is also a civil lawsuit filed by Ms. Seping claiming over 50 million baht in damages.
