[ad_1]
The Constitutional Court accepts a request for a manifestation to annul the sentence.
Date September 16, 2020 at 18:51
The Constitutional Court accepts the request “Nathaporn A Prayoon” consider the knot “Anon – Panupong-Panasaya” The rally to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State.
On September 16, the Constitutional Court considered petitioner Nathaporn Toprayoon’s request for a decision under article 49 of the Constitution, alleging that the defendant, made up of various groups of people, delivered a speech on September 3. January, August 10, August 20, August 21 and August 30, that on August 18, the petitioner presented a petition to the Attorney General. Pursuant to Article 49 of the Constitution, the petitioner submitted a request to the Constitutional Court for the Constitutional Court to decide and issue an order to dismiss said act in accordance with Article 49 of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court will decide whether the action of various groups of people in the organization of six meetings is the exercise of rights or freedoms to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State under article 49 of the State of Thon Manu. Whatever is
But the fact according to the petition appears that on August 18 the petitioner presented a petition to the Attorney General for his consideration to request the decision of the Constitutional Court. In accordance with Article 49, second paragraph of the Constitution, regarding the organization of the meeting of the group of people on August 10, at Thammasat University, Rangsit Center, which, according to the request, indicated that the speech assembly that day had 3 speakers. The persons who acted according to the complainant were Mr. Anon Nampha, Mr. Panupong Chadnok and Ms. Panasaya Sitthichirawattanakul. In the case of article 49, third paragraph of the Constitution, the petitioner may submit a petition directly to the Constitutional Court.
Regarding the request that claims to be dealt with in other meetings. It did not appear that the petitioner had submitted a petition to the Attorney General of the Nation under Article 49, second paragraph, the Constitutional Court ordered to accept a specific petition regarding the actions of the three respondents at a meeting on August 10 for its consideration. And advises the singer In addition to sending a copy of the petition to the three defendants to present an explanation of the accusation within fifteen days of the date of receipt of a copy of the petition AND for the benefit of consideration, He ordered the Prosecutor General to notify the result of the operation and present the relevant documents and evidence presented by the petitioner on August 18 to the Constitutional Court within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notification.
[ad_2]
