[ad_1]
February 14, 2021 – 18:09
Confident “Niphon” after the joint announcement of the match I think I can clear up all the issues. And without fear, “Si Suwan” cries to the Prime Minister for punishment. Identify yourself as old The case is not yet final.
Mr. Niphon Boonyamanee, Deputy Minister of the Interior and Deputy Leader of the Democratic Party Revealed after a clarification In the ministerial seminar Essay before the discussion, I did not trust that Cleared with government whips In all respects, I am sure I can understand. With its expected part This is the Chana Water Resources Development Project in Songkhla province, which deals with the authority of the SAO in its management, so we are not worried and willing to explain and clarify. In particular, the matter to be removed, insist that all reasons can be clarified. That he did not use his power to benefit anyone
In the event that Mr. Srisuwan Chanya prepares to present a punishment to Prime Minister Niphon for bringing the budget of 34 million baht to subsidize the Songkhla Sports Association, which is the national budget, Mr. Nipon said that the Mr. Srisuwan has the right to present, but everyone agrees with the process. Of the law And think that this case is the highest administrative court I still do not judge who is wrong and who is right
Therefore, we must first await the court proceedings. And those matters are matters from the moment of being Prime Minister of the Provincial Administrative Organization, which is a matter that has been explained until the end of the process. And it is in the process of justice. Therefore, wanting to wait until the process of justice is finished first.
“Paiboon” reiterates protest if the opposition is concerned about institutional discussions.
Paiboon Nititawan, deputy Palang Pracharat Party Mention of a motion proposed for the assembly to adopt a resolution to present a motion for debate of the opposition to the decision of the Constitutional Court. That it is unconstitutional or not After binding the institution that the motion was already included as an urgent motion. But he admitted that he could not hold this meeting up to date. Because next week there is only one movement. It is a distrustful debate. But during the debate he did not trust. He will also speak about said motion. And if Mr. Sompong Amornwat, leader of the opposition Stand up and give a movement By reading the phrases related to the institution They will stand up to protest And discuss why If there are still some protests But if you do not mention it or omit it, do not there will be problem. But hopefully the opposition will take precautions. Avoiding it would be helpful to the opposition.
But just to protest OR to dissolve the party also speaking of the institution, Paiboon said that the protest would be only the first stop. But if the opposition insists on talking about it, it will end up in the Constitutional Court.
Asking the opposition to think of an illustration of the dissolution of the Thai Raksa Chart Party Because it was he who presented the dissolution of the Thai Raksa Chart Party It is important to note that there are many ways to present this matter to the Constitutional Court, not just a motion presented by the Constitutional Court.
You can follow great content like this at
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/innnews.co.th
Twitter: https://twitter.com/innnews
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/INNNEWS_INN
Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@inn_news
[ad_2]
