[ad_1]
สัมภาษณ์พิเศษ ณัฐวุฒิ กรัณยโสภณ
Constitution Resolution Game Hot Season of the Year No Matter the End At the meeting, Parliament will vote the Agenda 3 backwards or move on. It would send an earthquake to the whole earth because every provision of the constitution is binding on all organizations.
“Prachachat business” Chat with “Cocom Areeya” Academic of Nonviolence As president of the Constitution for Democracy
He used to be a practitioner Important people according to the People’s Constitution of 1997 as the 1st Electoral Commission and they participated in the campaign not to accept the draft constitution of 2017 before the referendum of August 7, 2016.
Today, he and his associates must join the command. Breaking the Constitutional Amendment Trap Again
The Constitutional Court votes in favor of Agenda 3
“Khodom” Begin to analyze the judgments of the Constitutional Court that 1. The Constitutional Court tells parliament that it has the power to consider amendments to the constitution. 2. First hold a referendum. 3. Hold a referendum after the draft of the new constitution.
“Make a referendum first” The court did not say it had to do it twice, the first time before accepting the principle of drafting the first and second amendments to the constitution. After the Draft Amendment to the Constitution approved Agenda 3 or not, the Court did not say so.
As a general rule, a referendum will not ask the people before adopting the principle of a new constitution. Due to the last two constitutional referendums, it will be asked if they agree with the draft constitution of the commission (Km.) That it drafts or not. People must see that. What kind of figure came from? There will be a new constitution with what kind of deputies, even if the law is proposed in Agenda 1, they must have a bill before they can vote.
Therefore, after the third term, a referendum will be held gradually. Let the people accept the principle of establishing power Issue the constitution by vote You do not have to torture yourself. Why hold a referendum twice? “
“Judicial interpretation OR law Must be able to interpret it in a practical way Without conflict with common sense But if to interpret the mess that Must referendum before accepting the principles Without knowing which principle Believes that people get confused by spending time and wasting money”
Let the people decide by referendum
“Khodom” Mention the resonance of the Senate and the part of the Government Senate Who intends to vote by repealing the draft constitutional amendment for agenda 3 that the people decide by making a referendum is not better or And then continue with the campaign and say No Accepting the constitution after the third term is a right that senators can do if they do not agree with this draft amendment. That you guys did on your own up to a point And said that he didn’t take it away even if it was a right, but that he shouldn’t kick the kid out
No doubt that If you annul the draft amendment to the constitution on Agenda 3 and recount to one, ask people whether you should amend the entire constitution to agree or not. “Khodom” Contradict this idea that counting 1 per referendum is fun. I don’t know what I agree with. It does not make any sense. I still can’t understand why. I am a citizen without knowing anything. So what will happen? Tell me to accept the beginning … the beginning of what is still unknown
“The word for the new constitution There are many processes. The amendments in the parliament have a new constitution, for example, the year 1996, all the amendments except Chapter 1, Chapter 2, but the parliament said no Because the people you want to have deputies and deputies, there are many types of appointments and elections. If you are going to do something, you must first ask the public clearly. “
Asked if it was the intention of the government or not. They want the constitutional game to fall “Khodom” Answer that if you are going to pretend to stumble upon the interruption, why are you speaking now? Since it is government policy and the Senate must support government policy. If you’ve been serious all along, you should be able to walk, but if you continually switch legs, there is political finesse. People will see for themselves.
Passed the 3 national agenda to benefit
On the corner of “Kho Thom” that If the constitutional amendment process continues to have a deputy, there will be many contributions to society. 1. Reduce social tension 2. Open a spacious area to talk. Allow people to learn about politics during this time. 3. Elected deputies Must go down to the public There will be a mechanism that will cause the feeling that the people participate in the constitution established by the people.
After the 2007 constitution continued until the 2017 edition, why has the constitutional amendment process been blocked all the time? “Khodom” I thought calmly before answering that we are afraid that the deputies will modify the constitution. When Thaksin Shinawatra was a one-party government, there were enough deputies to amend the constitution. I didn’t see anything.Someone argued, I said that the 1997 constitution facilitated Thaksin. So why do you fix it? But I don’t think that is so true.
“It is natural not to want to amend the constitution Except for technical problems, conflicts and disagreements. But the current constitution is not technically a stalemate. But there is a consensus stalemate.”
“It is a political conflict. The bad thing is the transitory provision. National strategy The reform forces the ethics of the people. Practically uncontrollable The intention of the writer would be very good. They want people to be ethical Do not let someone fool you Dissolve the party , it is said that playing is completely wrong. “
“And the caretaker (government), we do not trust. Because it is from the 2017 constitution and the person responsible for the constitution (senators) is now one In harmony now That he cannot go because I feel Or several people feel Being prohibited This is not a constitution in which we feel involved. But it was the constitution of the NCPO, it was out of the coup. “
“Regarding the constitution, everything the NCPO does is correct by law. And, as with this constitution, he wrote Goats are sheep, he writes. But people felt that it was not. At least one of me has no heart to let others criticize completely. He wants to pass a referendum. It is a question of politics It is not a question of nation “
Conservative, don’t be afraid in advance.
Amendments to the constitution are a big problem for academics, politicians, but for the people’s struggle they are diverted by institutional issues. Does article 112 of the criminal law make constitutional reform less important?
“Khodom” He said that it was the government that was determined to walk this path. If you are firm, without any pressure, you can walk. Don’t amend the constitution because outside the council to lobby. This is what it should be.
“At first, the constitution was amended well because of the voice of the students. The students clearly said that they would amend the constitution. Now they are still talking about amending the constitution. But there are also conversations about Section 112. If the government sees that there is a 112 inserted and does not amend the constitution Do not listen outside But there are many external sounds Not a single sound, so take the external sound first. And asked if we intend Either to see the benefit in itself or not “
Controversial “Khodom” That when the government benefits from the constitution, will the constitution be resolved? He replied that if the powerful does not intend to leave, because the authority will find a way to kick the child and find a way to disturb him.
It is like a mirror that reflects. All I think about is making a wonderful constitution. But it is not as wonderful as advertised. If the authority is here that there are people who are starting to protest against the powerful, well … that people are protesting, really, can you do something better?
Take the voice of the people. Now I must say that it is a medium sound. I still don’t know how the parliamentarians will come. Why are you scared first? If the competent person does not intervene The opposition does not intervene too much, add, subtract, multiply, divide SSS, there is no hidden agenda. The writing of a new constitution is also an open area.
“That didn’t change. NCPO fell from power The opposition came to power. It will lead the ability to amend the constitution. For the benefit of the opposition That, if it were conservatism, hey … How could you do this? But today, not like this, there are deputies taking the process as a whole. Independent If no one goes to Alchemy for the benefit of any group “.
Power is not eternal
But what if the person in authority looks in the mirror and is on your side? “Khodom” Answer the question that there is nothing forever. You (NCPO) have been around for almost 7 years and can do it at an active age. When I had all the power, I should have. Why are you going to determine the future in so many different ways when the future is uncertain?
“Don’t think the power is mine. It belongs to me. I am the best in power. Anyway it has to change. Someone new has arrived. You already have to develop in the future, you are going to slow down in the future, let’s say… No, don’t change, you have to stay that way. But people’s minds changed. Not stationary “
Or people outside the council are desperate for amendments to the constitution. Therefore, it is not so important Cotom believes that there is no other way, bittersweet, you have no power, you have to walk according to your power. You must try desperately. I don’t think so. Must follow this
“The one who has the power to amend the constitution is the council and the people. Even if we don’t like the Senate, it has to be bittersweet with these things.” But we have the power to invite. Understanding people Of course … we have to show people who agree with us more. “
Ask one last question. Do you believe in the sincerity of politicians to amend the constitution? “Khodom” He said there was no choice. Amending the constitution, having to depend on deputies and senators to get to this level is very good. If they say they do not believe, the deputies do not believe that the government does not believe that the government does not know where to travel.
“If say who lost the benefit of doing this I do not think so We did not do it for us. Can it be done so that young people emerge in the future? Write something for the future Not present We want politics to be stable. I want politics I can solve many problems using the power to rule the country. I will say that I wasted But I do not live forever. “
[ad_2]
