‘Chuwit’ Siewit instead of ‘Nong Thon’ pays 20 million baht, probably a ‘bribe’



[ad_1]

December 19, 2020 – Mr. Chuwit Kamolvisit posted a message via Facebook as follows:

Difference between “commission” and “bribery”

The simple “commission” principle for any honest trader is that it is a cost. It must be recorded as an expense in the company’s accounting. And it must have tax withholding, regardless of whether the commission is called OR operating cost. It must deduct taxes. Because in accounting, it must be recorded as the “cost” of the business.

Except paying a fee “under the table”
Value of “hot water, tea”
Value of “tribute”
Cost of “peripheral allocation”
“Management Costs

It’s up to you to call

Or is it officially called “bribery” value?

Thus, there are no merchants. Or what accountant dares to save it as a business expense? The more it is a foreign company, the more fear they have of these things. But in Thailand we relax Because if it is not paid History does not walk Therefore, register otherwise, as a certification or pay personal money instead

Therefore, I have to see that Khun Sakulthon’s claim that he paid 20 million as an operating fee to acquire the right to lease the land from the Beautiful Plot Property Office on Chidlom Road

When paying this sum of money, is it withholding tax or not? And was the money deducted sent to the Department of Revenue in that month or not?

Also, you cannot pay backwards. Because if not withholding taxes and money withheld from the Department of Revenue since then instead, you tend to be fearful instead of calling it “bribery.”
But before that, he was doing gray business. I’m very good at this kind of thing

People whose family enters the political cycle need to be careful. Lost and the case followed by a xylophone



[ad_2]