[ad_1]
“Amarat” stepped forward to sue “Rambo Isan”, calling the final indictment claiming to use Section 112 to silence the opposition and deny all allegations. Point out as a personal bias He reiterated the opposition’s duty to review the constitution.
On February 19, 2021, at the House of Parliament, Ms Amarat Chokpamitkul, MP for Kao Klai’s party list, together with Wirot Lakkhana Adisorn, the party spokesperson, made a statement to the media about the case of Mr. Suporn Attawong, Assistant Minister. Prime Minister Prepare to prosecute Section 14 of the Informatics Act, including the use of Section 112 of the Penal Code against Ms Amarat Chokpamitkul, MP, as a party list, setting aside the case of accusing Ms Amarat of misconduct. Confidence General Prayut Chan-o-cha, prime minister and used the words to parody the institution on the Facebook fan page. And personal Facebook
Outstanding news
Wiroj said that of the case that happened It is a distillation In the use of the Penal Code, article 112 to silence the opposition deputies, which, in fact, is what SM Amarat’s practice It is the duty of Deputies, the party of the opposition In the debate, do not trust the government According to a motion proposed to the House of Representatives And according to the constitution, preliminary, the Kao Klai Party law party has examined There is an opinion that It is interpreted by bias Mr. Suporn, who then asked to see whether the police would accept the request. And the legal side of the party will continue to process.
While Amarat said such a case occurred after his mistrust debate on the first day (February 16, 64) against Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha on three counts, which is a normal function as a member of the opposition party. In the debate over the checks and balances of government work As legislative On the charges that Mr. Suporn claimed to have defamed against Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha and went to trial in the Division of Suppression of Technological Crimes (POT ). He posted the words that mocked the monarchy through his Facebook fan page. And personal Facebook
He was confident that he had never published a mockery accused by Mr. Suporn, who had consulted the Kao Klai Party Legal Department, willing to take legal action to the end.
This case is an act of using Mr. Suporn’s prejudice, not much, to intimidate each other into using Section 112 of the Penal Code to silence opposition deputies. And public opinion. And then He’ll wait to review Mr. Suporn’s request from the police station again for the sake of clarity. And let the Legal Department do its best
In this regard, Mr. Wiroj concluded that Progressive Party Legal Team will prosecute Mr. Suporn Attawong, Deputy Prime Minister Under the charge of false reports AND defamation under article 177 and leave the policeman who accepted the request If you check that It is not considered as guilty as Mr. Supon’s complaint and if the officer continues to prosecute Ms. Amarat in the Laem Klai Party Legal Department, he is ready to prosecute the police under Section 157 and 200 for deliberately using a case. criminal to prosecute anyone take the blame When filing a lawsuit in Criminal Court for fraud and misconduct To pursue to the fullest
Read more …
