“Samart” singing “Piyabutr-Isaw” tells a lie about the Constitution 60

“Samart” singing “Piyabutr-Isaw” tells a lie about the 60’s constitution to support the Constitutional Court to hold a 2-round referendum.

Today (March 13) Mr. Samart Jenchai Jitavanich Deputy Minister of Justice As director of the Complaints Center, the Pracharat Party (NACC) revealed that I would like to warn everyone who came out. Inciting a constitutional amendment is not correct. Because amendments to the constitution must be made by consensus, asking everyone first. So, whether it’s what Ailaw is doing, or even Piyabut Saengkanokkul, who has come forward to charge that the 60th constitution is an unrestricted constitution. And he asks for the destruction of the 60-year-old constitution, which wants to clarify that said constitution is a version of the constitution to repress fraud. Therefore, there will be people struggling to solve it, especially some politicians will hate it because it is a problem. Stating that if any politician is sentenced to prison OR having to go to jail, it will cause famine to become a politician to run the country immediately. Therefore, this group of people wants to reform the constitution. Therefore, I would like to warn the members of the House of Representatives and Senators. Comply with the ruling of the Constitutional Court.

Mr. Can also revealed that the votes on Agenda 3 from March 17-18, 64 are due to the final decision of the constitutional court, with an 8-to-1 resolution that parliament has the power to amend the constitution. New version But there must be two referendums: The people with the power to establish the constitution must first hold a referendum, whether the people want to have a new constitution or not. And when the new constitution project is finished, should the public vote in a referendum to approve or not the new constitution project again.

“Therefore, during March 17-18, the votes of the members of the House of Representatives and the Senate I believe that the Constitutional Court has easy-to-read sentences. It is not necessary to interpret that the amendment of the constitution Have the power to edit But you have to hold a referendum to ask the public first, then what is the past? Whether it’s a government constitution, an opposition body, or an Isle of Law, that’s fine. No referendum has been held to ask the Thai people across the country to amend the 60 year constitution or not is considered contrary to the order of the Constitutional Court. I think the best solution is for deputies and senators. Refrain from voting against the draft Agenda 3 “

He went on to reveal that he warned Mr. Piyabutr to respect the court’s ruling. And it should use the knowledge. Do it for the benefit of the country. Don’t use your knowledge to destroy the nation. As well as politicians at a distance who are stubborn in amending the constitution AND listen to the voice of Mr. Piyabutr What worried him that in the next era there would not be an advanced party because people did not choose Or it may be illegal and cause the dissolution of the party. Because looking at all the previous elections it can be seen that the public has never chosen any political party to amend the constitution. Because the people themselves want a political party to do it for the people. You want the government to solve the problem OR representatives of the people you can trust General Prayut Chan-ocha, Prime Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister As the leader of the party, the NCCC has always responded to the problem-solving problems of people. Anyone who claims to have a mafia because he wants to amend that constitution, thinks that is not true. From every election in the past, it shows that the majority of Thais in that country want a government that really does it for the people.