[ad_1]
March 10, 2020 – At Thonburi Criminal Court The court reads the verdict, black case number Or. 1228/2563, where the prosecutor is the plaintiff, suing Mr. Supakorn Pinitbut as a defendant in the case of the defendant who posts text and edits images about the King on Facebook. Request punishment in accordance with the Computer Crimes Act, BE2550 (2007), Section 14 (2) (5), the Computer Crimes Act (No. 2), BE2560, section. 8 Penal Code, Section 33, 91 Penal Code Amendment Act (No. 6) BE 2526, Section 4
In this case, the plaintiff sued During the period from April 10 to 23, 2020, the defendant entered the computer system by sending data, images and letters on the state of the computer system. The processor may have logged into the computer system through an Internet service provider. On the website Facebook.com (www.facebook.com) or the Facebook application (Facebook) in the Facebook name “Miang Prak Meng Phreng” and “Dumrong Konrakchat”. Which is open to the public The defendant posted a photo montage of King Rama 10 and posted a photo of King Rama IX and posted a photo editing the face of a person wearing a Thai monarchy. Accompanying text The defendant already knew that said statement was false computer data. And with the intention that the public express opinions and criticize in a way that damages the monarchy AND causes public conflicts A condition or situation that creates instability in a country. The defendant posted the message and image in a manner likely to cause damage to national security a total of 9 times.
The defendant pleaded guilty to the plaintiff. And the court allows the probation officer to investigate and examine the defendant prior to trial.
The Court examined the defendant’s investigation report and found him guilty under the Cybercrime Act 2007, section 14 (2) (5). To punish each karma as an offense According to the Penal Code, Section 91, including 9 counts of imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants pleaded guilty. Helpful to Consider There is a rationale Reduce the penalty by half the krathong. Under the Penal Code, Section 78 would be jailed for 6 months, a total of 9 counts, including 54 months.
Taking into account the circumstances of the case, accompanying the defendant’s investigation and examination report, and seeing that the defendant posted a photo editing the King of Thailand, Rama 10 posted a photo of Thai King Rama IX and posted a photo of the face of a person. wearing a royal royal suit Accompanying the message The defendant already knew that said statement was false computer data. Because the defendants were amused that the public had seen the publication and criticized the monarchy in a way that was damaged. Even the defendants acted to solicit the attention of the general public. It did not appear that the defendant had been employed or compensated. But the defendant’s actions were seen as undermining the monarchy. Disgrace honor Reduce people’s faith in the monarchy. What is the main institution of the nation And cause public conflicts There is a condition or situation that harms national security Including damage to the security of the country The circumstances of the case are serious. In the event that it is not appropriate to wait for the sanction of the accused to confiscate the media
[ad_2]
