[ad_1]
February 27, 2021 – 12:45
The NCCC spokesperson thanked the members of parliament for pushing to amend the constitution through agenda 2, without worrying in case the constitutional court decides
Rames Ratanachaweng, Democratic Party spokesman Mention additional constitutional amendments in Agenda 2 that the Democratic Party There is a clear principle for amending the constitution. Thanks to the parliamentarians who have passed a resolution to approve Agenda 2, which can be seen in the details of each section in the amendment to Article 256 with the return to the original draft, using a 3-on-5 vote and Section 256 to facilitate modification of the constitution.
In amending this constitution, Chapter 15/1 was added to include 200 elected members of the Constituent Assembly, which is considered to involve all sectors. By the Democratic Party It is resolved in the meeting to approve Agenda 3 on the promotion of amendments to the Constitution.
The part of the Constitutional Court that rules on the amendment Each section The party has no concerns. And the party is willing to comply with the decision of the Constitutional Court. In the past, the party saw that there were some clauses that lack democracy. Or you have problems in practice. But I confirm that the party has complete information if the Constitutional Court wants more information.
The NACC has not spoken with anyone instead of “permanent” sitting in the Minister of Transport, still confident in the original quota, emphasizing that “permanent” is still the Parliamentarians are willing to clarify whether someone has requested interpretation from the court.
Rames Ratanachaweng, Democratic Party spokesman Mentioned cabinet adjustment In proportion to the party after Mr. Thavorn Seniam, former Vice Minister of Transport Must vacate office That the power to adjust cabinet belongs to Prime Minister But at this time there is no sign of the Prime Minister. To the party leader and party secretary in any way In which the Democratic Party is in the process of voting in the electoral campaign area in the 3rd constituency, Nakhon Si Thammarat province. Help Mr. Pongsin Senpong, therefore, there is no discussion on the matter of the reorganization of the party cabinet and who will replace him.
Regarding the quota of the Democratic Party as before or not, Mr. Rames said that the principle remains the same. And according to an interview by General Prawit Wongsuwan, Deputy Prime Minister, who is not concerned and still adheres to the principles Cabinet quota setup That has been defined since he entered the government. This is important to believe that political parties adhere to the original approach to forming a government.
By the termination of the membership of the deputies. Of the 3 names that appear in the rebel PDRC verdict, both imprisoned and removed from the elections for 5 years, should be divided into cases where the court sentenced only to prison, composed of Mr. Thaworn Senium, MP, province of Songkhla. What, if you look at the constitution. Membership of Mr. Thavorn Does not end Examining the law Does not comply with any constitutional prohibition at all. Because the case is not yet final The principles of the law are clearly specified and the parts that parliamentarians have to look for the names of the Constitutional Court. Democratic party It is willing to fully clarify the facts of the Constitutional Court.
The other two people sentenced to prison and the court determined to revoke the electoral rights for a period of 5 years, Mr. Chumpol Chulasai, deputy, Chumpon province and Issara Somchai, deputies. The Democratic Party follows all constitutional processes.
“Ramet” prepared evidence presented against MPs, social posts, insults to court, accusations have 2 standards released 8 DPW.
Rames Ratanachaweng, spokesman for the Democratic Party Press release on the case that a deputy posted on social media after The court allowed the release of 8, the former NCPO leader, stated that “if one party has bail The other party should have it Also. If not, it should not be the same. If there is a Cautious ticket system It may be the beginning of the collapse of the credibility of the Thai judicial system “, seen as a misrepresentation message. Slander the power of the judiciary It is alleged that the court has two rules, it has a ticket system similar to that of an order. Provide the temporary release of 8 people who are former NCPO leaders, which is compared to the case of 4 youth leaders who were not released.
Mr. Rames went on to say that he wanted to tell the truth about deliverance. Or not rescue him The judge looks at the facts from rhetoric. Different circumstances By DPW leaders. The 8 people, the Court of Appeals, determined that there will be behavior to escape? Are there enough values in the presentation as specified? And if you let go, are you going to repeat the offense? If you compare with the four people who are the leaders of the youth group It has been thrown many times Countless times But when you gave permission If you are going to commit the same crime again It will be a false statement in the case at the court hearing.
In which the evidentiary documents were prepared Related to parliamentarians as persons To go further Secretary General of the Office of the Courts of Justice To determine whether this act is guilty of article 198 or not, if it is incorrect, it must be processed as a precedent .
You can follow great content like this at
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/innnews.co.th
Twitter: https://twitter.com/innnews
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/c/INNNEWS_INN
Tik Tok: https://www.tiktok.com/@inn_news
[ad_2]
