[ad_1]
February 24, 64 – Time at 3:30 p.m. after the Parliament meeting Discuss the draft of the National Police Law and the Bill that promotes the use of research and innovation. Completed Therefore, it has entered the agenda for the consideration of the Kingdom of Thailand’s draft amendment for the second term, as already discussed by the Commission. Pornpetch Wichitcholchai, Vice Speaker of Parliament Act as chair of the meeting
Mr Wirat Ratanaset, MP, Pracharat Party party list Clarification of the draft constitutional amendment Accepting the principles and voting for approval on Agenda 3 requires two-thirds of the members of Parliament The 200 deputies are all elected. When the deputies drafted the constitution, it ended. Present a draft amendment to the National Assembly. Discuss and express opinions within 30 days without voting. And send the draft to the Election Commission within 7 days for a referendum Then give KMath a minority and members of the debate the opportunity to express their opinions. Starting with section 3 Subject: Proposal to amend Section 256 Amendment to the Constitution Many opposition deputies opposed the opinion of the majority of the votes, stating that the agenda for the adoption of principles and the vote on Agenda 3 it was necessary to amend the Constitution. 2-thirds of parliament Because there are too many Making it difficult to amend the constitution Proposing to modify only half of the parliamentary vote
Mr. Kumnoon Sittisamarn, Senator (Senate), discussed whether The number of votes for the amendments to the Constitution for Agenda 1 and 3, which use three-fifths of the votes according to the draft that the coalition government is already appropriate, if two-thirds of the votes KMath amended are deemed inappropriate. Because if the senators don’t agree, there will be no way to amend the constitution. Now there are 487 of the voices of the deputies, if two-thirds of the parliament is required or 492, even if the speaker of the House has signed. It is still not enough to modify the Constitution Agenda 1 and 3
Mister. Democratic party As a minority member, two-thirds of the constitutional amendments were considered too high. So far, there have been eight constitutional amendments to only half of the members of Parliament, claiming that amending the constitution should be difficult. It should not be too difficult to create a constitutional stalemate or crisis. If it is a little more than half that is acceptable, but if two thirds of the voice is used you should not agree. At the moment, there are almost 500 deputies who still cannot solve it. If the senator disagrees Make the people feel that Democracy cannot solve the people’s problems. I want you to go back to the same 3 of 5 sound.
Rangsiman Rome, MP, party list, said it was not necessary. Why do some issues, some sections and some categories have to hold a referendum? Doing this Because a thief The previous constitution was amended by Chapter 1-2. It is not a problem Causing the country to change the regime I do not agree with the Constitutional Court Get involved with the constitutional amendment We have to limit the Power of the Constitutional Court Give the people the power to amend the constitution as much as possible This is a critical solution .
Somkid Chuakong, MP from Ubon Ratchathani, Pheu Thai Party, said he was pleased that Khamnoon said the constitution amendment to free 256 but back and forth would lock him up for another floor or not. Because even the members of the House cannot resolve, whether they use two-thirds or three-fifths of the vote, because if the people don’t want them resolved, they cannot be resolved. In the revised draft of Pheu Thai Party I agree to use the sound only Half voice
Then giving a chance Parliamentarians join the discussion Deputies of the opposition. Discussion in a similar direction, Mr. Sutin Klangsang, MP Maha Sarakham, Pheu Thai Party, argued that the use of two-thirds of the voice was written to fail to resolve. The only solution that can be solved is a coup, which is why it is indicated with two-thirds of the votes, arguing that the constitution should be difficult to amend. Should tweak new ideas.If it’s easy to fix and not distorted, fix it. If it is difficult to fix, it seems more worrying The constitutional crisis is Writing a constitution does not make sense The scene of the bananas People who propose to use two thirds of their voices. It is the person who intends to submit the matter to the Constitutional Court, interpreting the competence of Parliament in the drafting of the new constitution. The government wants to modify each section. Intuitively, what you are thinking of fixing will not be used, it will fall before perdition 3 If you want to use your voice 3 out of 5 were asked to come and speak. But if two of the three voices are used, the crisis is ahead
Until 20.20, the reporter reported that After Congress It took almost 4 hours to consider the draft constitution amending Section 256 in the meeting with Mr. Pornpetch Wichitcholchai, the President of the Senate. As Vice Chairman of the National Assembly Act as Chairman of the meeting Voted against the Commission Amendment (KMT) to use two-thirds of the votes to approve the Draft Amendments for Program 1 and Program 3 reverting to the original draft , which is a three-fifths vote. Vote in favor of the draft amendment to the constitution for agenda 1 and 3 with 441 votes against 178 votes.
[ad_2]
