[ad_1]
February 23, 64 – In the Democratic Party, Mr. Ramet Ratanachaweng, spokesman for the Democratic Party Announced after the party meeting that The meeting did not consider the case of the 3 deputies who defeated the party’s resolution in the debate vote and they distrusted the Minister. Having to make a letter explaining the reasons for the vote, but 23 party deputies submitted a letter to the party secretary. Request the creation of a committee to investigate the three deputies because they consider that such actions are inappropriate to abstain from the party leader. But he returned to vote to trust other ministers who must comply with party regulations. Is the party secretary to consider himself OR set up 3 examiners to complete the process in 15 days, then what will be the results? You must wait for the investigation process. But this time it hasn’t started.
Mr. Rames confirmed that the problem was not a rift within the party. Because it is a matter that happened to only 3 people and society would understand that what the 3 people did is correct or not. I would like to ask if Anwarsa and MP Pattani were party leaders, how would the members do it?
When asked to argue that Democrats adhere to democracy AND the Constitution gives MPs the privilege of voting A spokesman for the Democratic Party said: The constitution to protect MPs’ rights is correct. But everyone must comply with party regulations and resolutions for the party to survive. And before the vote, there is a meeting of the deputies’ party. Why did no one say The party minister made ambiguity. Or say you will not vote AND the majority of votes passed a resolution allowing everyone to vote for their confidence. You must adhere to this resolution. So this story has not ended for sure. Must have action in accordance with party regulations.
News reports reported that Mr. Panit Wikitset, a member of parliament, was at the meeting. And Mr. Anwar also came. Mr. Apichai Taechaubol, list of deputies Did not attend the meeting Mr. Panit tried to clarify the reasons for doing so. But Mr. Chairman of the Party Advisory Council Do not talk about it Asking to wait until the election is over AND fear that there will be problems within the party Therefore, he asked the 3 deputies to send clarifications on the documents. As a result, Panit sent an open letter on all the reasons to the party leader. Mr. Anwar left the meeting room. Seeing that this matter was not mentioned
The open letter of Mr. Panit said that After listening to the discussion of the 10 ministers, but could not vote the confidence with the three ministers, but to have the least impact on the Democrats and the party ministers. And political etiquette when joining the government That is why he decided to vote as “Abstain” for all. And he also emphasized that his decision-making principles are believed to be Analyzed And after this, he is ready to take responsibility for his “posture” with this vote.
[ad_2]
