[ad_1]
Parina’s Facebook post states that Seri Phisuth must be identified as a grave moral error. Accused of invading the forest too Not to discriminate
Parina Kraigupt MP Ratchaburi, Palang Pracharat Party Is posting a message on Facebook clarifying the case of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) stating the culpability of the seizure, possession and misuse of state land is a violation or not? Follow serious ethical standards than #ethics when the NACC identifies an offense. Serious Ethics In the case of Parena who has Chapter 5, the land in the Sor Por.Por., Listed on the property list, politicians and government officials who have paid taxes, Chapter 5, all will be ethical
I would like to confirm that such land was subsequently purchased from other farmers in accordance with Chapter 5 documents, and that the land was put to work in good faith, that is, by raising chickens openly and legally. Tax is paid AND applies for a standard farm certificate before being MP.
Today, Parina is charged, as is Seri Phisuth, who is accused of invading the forest, both of which the court has yet to decide. The case is not over yet. Go to justice
Parina maintains that Seri Pisuth should be identified as a serious misconduct as Parina. In order not to discriminate and when the NACC submits to the court, it is the discretion of the court to temporarily cease to perform its duties or not. For this reason, he asks to respect the court to have mercy on this farmer who raised chickens before becoming deputies.
Thosaphon asked not to give press conferences and interview It is the first case in Thailand In the process of studying and preparing to proceed in detail, Parina would like to express her feelings on this matter only once. And let the legal process follow. They won’t give any more interviews as Tossapon requests. If the press would like to interview later, please contact Thosaphon Peng Som
[ad_2]
