[ad_1]
Criminal Court dismisses 9 lawsuit, leaders of people want to choose Skywalk rally Speak violently But do not incite to incite unrest The weight of the plaintiff’s witness was not enough.
Today (December 25, 2020), reported the reporter The Bangkok Southern Criminal Court Cita to read the verdict, case 9, the leader of the group of people who want to choose MBK39 as a defendant in the case of a rally at the intersection Skywalk in Pathumwan, in front of the MBK Center shopping mall on January 27, 2018, was brought for an offense under Penal Code, Section 116. Mr. Weera Somkid’s instigating base, Mr. Rangsiman Rome, Mr. Sirawit Serithivat (Cha Ni), Ms. Nuttamahattana (Bow), Mr. Anon Num Pha, Mr. Ekachai Hongkangwan, Mr. Sukrit Piensuwan, Mr. Netiwit Chotiphatpaisarn and Mr. Sombat Boonngam-anong (Lai Dots) were the total defendants.
Rangsiman Rome came to court and revealed that Prosecution, Article 116, crimes against the law of public assembly In the case of a rally organized 150 m from the royal court, it was confirmed that the event took place on the Skywalk in the Bangkok Art Gallery. The protesters measured the distance over 150m diagonally, but the police officers claimed that they had to measure the plane and did not reach the distance of 150m, so they should not be disappointed because they deliberately wanted an election to return Thailand to democracy. That will have been fair. But if it’s bad news, don’t be afraid. You have to wait and see if you will be disqualified by the parliamentarians or not.
The court recently found that Although protesters held rallies and speeches for the government to hold elections in November, they were not even incited for inciting unrest in the kingdom. In addition, it is not an act that goes beyond constitutional law Therefore, although the speech contained some indecent and inappropriate words But it did not incite to incite discomfort The evidence that the plaintiff testifies was insufficient, when he learned that the 9 defendants jointly committed the crime. Judge
After hearing the verdict, Mr. Sirawit Serithiwat or Sergeant New revealed that the court had decided that the assembly did not fit the two counts of crimes because it demanded a peaceful issue of rights and had no intention of approaching the monk’s fence. . Royal Palace While the police placed a sign showing the coordinates clearly showing the radius
Let government officials review the role of suing people like this or not. Because when entering a judicial process the court will consider the facts and finally dismiss the case. Please don’t use the law as a tool to intimidate people if they don’t get involved with the elements. The prosecutor requested that his discretion be truly independent.
[ad_2]
