[ad_1]
Constitutional Court Received a diagnosis of the situation of the deputy ‘Paiboon’, the dissolution of the node of the Popular Reform Party Move to the Pracharat party But there was no order to stop performing duties
On December 23, 2020, the Constitutional Court approved a resolution accepting a petition in the case of the Speaker of the House of Representatives presenting opinions of 60 parliamentarians requesting a decision in accordance with Article 82 of the Constitution that the membership of Mr. Paiboon Nititawan List of deputies, Palang Pracharat Party Is it terminated under Section 101 (10) of the Constitution along with Section 90 and Section 91 paragraph one (5)?
Stay on top of the news Press to follow the live news line.
On the case of Mr. Paiboon He is the leader of the Popular Reform Party and is a list of deputies of that party. Then he went to run for membership in the Palang Pracharat Party. After the People’s Reform Party ended its status as a political party under the Political Parties Law, Article 91, paragraph one (7), while Mr. Paiboon continued to serve as leader of the People’s Reform Party. Town until settlement was completed. And it is not on the Palang Pracharath Party candidate list filed with the Election Commissioner Before the election application closes Consider
Because he saw that the facts according to the request and the supporting documents In accordance with article 82, first paragraph, together with the 2018 Constitutional Court Regulations, article 7 (5) by Mr. Paibul The accused returns an explanation of the accusation to the Constitutional Court within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition. However, the court did not order Mr. Paiboon to stop working for MPs. Reasoning that The fact according to the request still does not seem a reasonable reason to suspect an order to stop working.
[ad_2]
