[ad_1]
Dec 23 ’20 – The Office of the Constitutional Court said The Constitutional Court has resolved to accept the petition in the case of the Speaker of the House of Representatives presenting opinions of 60 parliamentarians requesting a decision under article 82 of the Constitution that the membership of the Mr. Paiboon Nititawan MPs, MPs, Palangpracha State Party Is it terminated under Section 101 (10) of the Constitution along with Section 90 and Section 91 paragraph one (5)?
In Mr. Phaiboon’s case, he is the leader of the People’s Reform Party and is a member of the party’s list of deputies. He then went on to apply for membership in the Palang Pracharat Party. After the People’s Reform Party ended its status as a political party under the Political Parties Act, section 91, paragraph one (7), while Mr. Paiboon continued to serve as the leader of the People’s Reform Party. Town until the liquidation was completed and he could not He is a candidate on the MPH Phangpracharath Party candidate list filed with the Election Commissioner. Before the application for the elections is closed Consider Because you saw that the facts according to the request and the supporting documents In accordance with article 82, first paragraph, together with the 2018 Constitutional Court Regulations, article 7 (5) by Mr. Paibul The defendant returns an explanation of the accusation to the Constitutional Court within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of the petition.
However, the court did not order Mr. Paiboon to stop working for MPs. Reasoning that The fact according to the request still does not seem a reasonable reason to suspect a ceasefire order.
[ad_2]
