[ad_1]
“Tipanan” urged “Thanathorn Chuengroongkit” to investigate 20 million cases of bribery of brother’s company, land cases, Mother’s Property Office Possessing illegal land
On December 19, Miss Thipa Nansiri Chana, Former BMA Candidate, Chom Thong-Thonburi District Former Deputy Speaker of the Palang Pracharat Party Mentioning the case that she had requested transparency for Mr. Thanathorn Chuengroongruangkit As a shareholder and owner of Real Asset Development Company Limited, at that time, answered questions with the company in case his younger brother was Mr. Sakulthorn Jungrungruangkit. He participated in the 500 million baht bribe and paid about 20 million baht to incentivize Real Asset for long-term lease rights. Without having to go through the tender process according to the usual process 12 days have passed and there is still no truthful answer as a shareholder and owner of said company. There is also a case where Mr. Thanathorn’s mother had land in the forest reserve. National and permanent forests I haven’t seen any clarification yet either.
Outstanding news
Ms. Thipanan said that after Mr. Sakulthorn’s younger brother Mr. Thanathorn’s statement on December 16, the past that Society has also criticized the lack of sufficient weight. Contrary to what was expressed on December 9 by the spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, who provided information “Regarding Mr. Sakulthorn The person who gives money to the first and second accused with the intention of taking it to the official to induce the commission of a crime Therefore, it seems that the second offender is used to commit the crime, Mr. Sakulthon is not the legally injured person. ” Legally injured person refers to a person who does not participate in the infringement or Is not a user OR sponsor OR witnessing an offense OR is not an act that also has an illegal purpose Therefore, it is the reason why Mr. Sakulthorn you cannot prosecute the fraudulent person. Due to civil and criminal prosecution with the beneficiary The plaintiff must not participate in the offense. Or according to the proverb of the law When they came to court with dirty hands The court did not accept the order of
“However, Mr. Sakulthorn’s statement Regarding the 20 million baht that is said to be commission money, it is questionable. Because the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 845 on the payment of tips to the broker states clearly that “Any person who agrees to indemnify the broker in order to enter into a contract. Managed to get a contract together He said that person will be responsible for compensation only when the contract. This has been done successfully thanks to the results that the broker has indicated or managed ”. Therefore, when Mr. Sakulthon had not entered into a contract with the Crown Property Bureau Therefore, the broker is not entitled to receive the money. Also, in the land rights auction of the Crown Property Office. The procedure must be followed openly. Allowing the general public to participate in the auction Therefore, it is unlikely that any brokers will be required, “Thipanan said.
Miss Thipanan said that the facts appeared in the investigation case And the verdict is more convincing than Sakulthon’s statement, which is said without weight, there is insufficient evidence to doubt the society. And finally, if Mr. Thanathorn, who is a role model for youth groups, Unable to examine, clarify, answer questions, or reform any matter From his own family, he would inevitably become a person alive with the ideology of the people, so The whole town should know that Mr. Thanathorn two standards Not equal and transparent as he cheated
Read more …
