[ad_1]
December 19 20 – Miss Thipa Nansiri Chana, Former BMA Candidate, Chomthong-Thonburi District Former Deputy Speaker of the Palang Pracharat Party Mention the case where Mr. Thanathorn requested transparency Chueng Rungruangkit, as a shareholder and owner of Real Asset Development Co. , Ltd., at the time, answered questions to the company in case his brother was Mr. Therefore prosperity He participated in the bribe of 500 million baht and paid about 20 million baht to incentivize Real Asset to acquire Long-term lease rights without having to pass the normal competitive auction. 12 days have passed and there is still no real answer as a shareholder and owner of said company. There is also a case where Thanathorn’s mother had land in the National Forest Reserve and the permanent forest. I still haven’t seen any clarification either.
Ms. Thipanan said that after Mr. Sakulthorn’s younger brother Mr. Thanathorn’s statement on December 16, the past that Society has also criticized the lack of sufficient weight. Contrary to what was expressed on December 9 by the spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, who provided information “Regarding Mr. Sakulthorn The person who gives money to the first and second offender with the intention of taking it to the official to encourage the crime, therefore Therefore, it seems that he uses the second offender to commit the crime. Mr. Sakulthorn is not a legally injured victim, “which explains in accordance with the law that Legislative Victim is a person who does not participate in the wrongful act or is not a user . Either sympathizers or seen in the offense, or it is not an act with an illegal purpose. Therefore, it is the reason that Mr. Sakulthorn cannot prosecute the fraudulent person. Due to civil and criminal prosecution with the beneficiary The plaintiff must not participate in the offense. Or according to the proverb of the law When they came to court with dirty hands The court did not accept the order of
“Statement from Mr. Sakulthorn As for the 20 million baht that is said to be commission money, it is questionable. Due to the Civil and Commercial Code, Section 845 on the payment of tips to the broker clearly states that” Any person who agrees to indemnify the broker in order to enter into a contract. Managed to get a contract together He said that this person will be responsible for paying the pension only when the contract has been successfully carried out due to the result of the broker directing or managing it ”. Therefore, when Mr. Sakulthon has not entered into a contract with the Royal Property Bureau Therefore, the broker is not entitled to receive the money. In addition, in the bidding of land rights from the Crown Property Office, the procedures should be taken openly. Allowing the general public to participate in the auction Therefore, there is no need for a broker, ”said Ms. Thipanan.
Ms. Thipanan said that the facts that appear in the investigation and the statements of the verdict are more reliable than the statements of Mr. Sakulthorn, without weight and without sufficient evidence to doubt society. And finally, if Mr. Thanathorn That is a model for youth groups Unable to examine, clarify, answer questions or reform any matter From his own family Inevitably he would become a person alive with the ideology of the people, so the whole people should know that Mr. Thanathorn two standards is not equal and transparent as deceives.
[ad_2]
