[ad_1]
The Electoral Commission ordered the removal of 6 applicants from the Provincial Administrative Organization after finding them in prison for cases of corruption in the game – as deputy deputies and ordered to return the right to nominate to 8 applicants for not having prohibited characteristics
On December 5, 2020, the Election Commission of Thailand (Electoral Commissioner) published a decision on the right to request the election of the members of the Provincial Administrative Organization Council (17 additional members of the Provincial Administrative Organization Council), divided into those that they did not receive Announcement of names on the electoral candidate list AND filed an objection against not disclosing the names of the names to the Electoral Commission, which the Electoral Commission considered qualified and did not have any prohibited characteristics.
Stay on top of the news Press to follow the live news line.
Along with an order to recruit and announce the list of candidates for a total of 8, consisting of Mr. Thanawat Waranwongcharoen Provincial Administrative Organization Candidates of Samut Prakan Province 3, Mr. Thammanoon Kasettham, Applicants for Provincial Administrative Organization of the Lampang Region 1, Mr. Padithon Saengkhun, Mae Hong Son Province 2 Provincial Administrative Organization Applicants, Mr. Natsak Sattayawong Nong Bua Lam Phu District 1 Provincial Administrative Organization Candidate, Mr. Sunthorn Rattanakorn, the candidate for First Minister of Kamphaeng Phet Province, Mr. Sulai Manwangsong, the applicant from the Provincial Administrative Organization of Krabi Province, Region 3, Mr. Sangkhom Thananchan, the SAO candidate. Yasothon District 1, Colonel Prasert Thongyos Candidate, Provincial Administrative Organization, Ubon Ratchathani Province Region 1
In the case of a petition against the hiring of the Prime Minister, PAO and the Provincial Administrative Organization, where the Electoral Commission issued an order to dismiss the petition, resulting in a total of three candidates who remain candidates for the elections, composed of Mr. Chumpol Kanjana, the candidate for Prime Minister of Surat Thani Province. Thanee, Mr. Supon Na Wichai, candidate, Chiang Mai Provincial Administrative Organization, District 2, Mr. Surasak Suniphat, candidate for Yasothon Provincial Administrative Organization, District 2
In addition, the Election Commission of Thailand is considering appearances before the Director of Elections of the PAO. In this regard, the Election Commission of Thailand issued an order to remove the name of the announcement from the list of 6 candidates, consisting of: 1. Mr. Itthiphol Srongsom, candidate of the Provincial Administrative Organization of Chiang Rai Province Due to the fact , was able to hear that Mr. Itthipol had been subject to final judgment for committing a fraudulent charge. It is a crime related to property committed with dishonesty according to the Penal Code. Therefore, being a person who is prohibited from exercising the right to stand for election,
2. Mr. Pattanaphong Rachapongkhan, candidate for the Bueng Kan Provincial Administrative Organization, due to the fact that Mr. Pattanapong is an operational assistant of Mr. Cherdphong Rachapongkhan, MPBungkan, therefore he is a qualified person. Banned for not exercising the right to stand for election. In that case Even Mr. Pattanapong will have to withdraw the application. And reported that he did not participate in any campaign activities, but the Electoral Commissioner of Bueng Kan said that he could not withdraw the candidate for the elections, 3. Mr. Watthana Sanguantham, candidate for the Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization Due to the fact that the Mr. Watthana was a defendant in a gambling case
The Nang Rong Provincial Court rendered the final verdict that he was guilty of the Gambling Law, although Mr. Watthana claimed that he was not the judge. And benefit from The Clear Mote Law on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej, 2007, but according to the verdict, it was found that Mr. Watthana confessed that he was a banker and in accordance with the Clean Malware Law. It only has the effect of assuming that the convicted person has never been punished by the sentence, but has no effect on invalidating the sentence. Mr. Watthana is therefore a person who is prohibited from exercising his right to stand for election.
4. Mr. Seksan Nirunpakorn, Candidate, Buriram Provincial Administrative Organization Due to the fact that Mr. Seksan was the defendant in the case Gambling Law The Nang Rong Provincial Court rendered the final verdict that he was guilty of the Gambling Law. Although Mr. Seksan claimed I once had to have such a trial as a dealer But benefit from Clear Flawless Act, however according to Clear Flawless Act it only has the effect of assuming that the convicted person has never been punished by the sentence, but it has no effect on invalidating the sentence. Mr. Seksan is a person who is prohibited from using the right to stand for election,
5. Mr. Noppadol Rungswang, Candidate, Saraburi Provincial Administrative Organization Due to the fact that Mr. Noppadol was sentenced to prison and released less than 5 years after Election Day AND it is not an offense that was committed due to negligence or pettiness. He is a person who is prohibited from exercising the right to stand in elections and 6. Mr. Phawatwes Bhakt, candidate of the Uthai Thani Provincial Administrative Organization. Due to the fact, it was heard that Mr. Phawat had the final judgment that he committed an offense in connection with dishonest acts under the Penal Code. It is a prohibited characteristic not to use the right to stand for election.
[ad_2]
