[ad_1]
Udom clarified the NCPO order, the end of the results according to the decision of the Constitutional Court. But the affected person cannot sue. As a result, when issuing an order to have power Point out the people who fled the country in order to return
Date 2 Dec 20 Mr. Udomrat Amarit Former Constitution Drafting Committee In the case of the Constitutional Court, it ruled that the order of the NCPO calling a person to report the unconstitutional status would lead to a case presented or considered in the Court of Justice. The court declined to consider further and had to dismiss the case or dispose of the case.
What effect will the NCPO have? As issuer of the order or not. I saw that it shouldn’t have any effect because it’s just a validation of the action. In which those affected will not be able to sue the NCPO for damages. Because this is like a person who has passed a law, the law that came out is contrary or inconsistent with the constitution. This law has come into force. But I will say that making it difficult for people when the law was released and the Constitutional Court still did not have a ruling had an impact. I can’t say that because in the end, the person who passed the law understood that they had the authority to issue at that time.
Follow the news, press follow the line fresh news
Mr. Udom He also said that When the Constitutional Court ruled like this People who have left the country before Because he did not want to inform himself by the NCPO order You can request to return to the country. Because the NCPO order cannot be executed in accordance with the Constitutional Court decision issued
“It is really a matter of time when we talk about the power of the government. He had power anyway, but this power to investigate whether he intended to harm was difficult to tell. For the purposes of the legislation Be immediate What you saw who had the power It is difficult to say if this was the case.Therefore, criminal civil liability is difficult to interpret as an offense. Because these are different legal opinions“
[ad_2]
