[ad_1]
The court ordered a 32-month prison term for “Watchara” bordering on the former NIA. New Parliamentary IT Leads
Date 02 Dec 2020 at 1:55 PM
The Criminal Court sentenced “Watchara” to the brink of “Chatchawal”, the former NESDB, four counts of the new TI Council, for a total of 32 months, fined 3,200 thousand and returning five hundred thousand of fame.
On December 2. New place And the former chairman of the expeditionary committee for the construction of the new parliament building as a plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Mr. Watchara Petchthong, a former Democratic deputy, for defamation through publicity. Pursuant to Section 326, 328 and asked the defendant to pay compensation with interest at a rate of 7.5 percent per annum as well
The plaintiff sued the circumstances and concluded that on March 7 the defendant had co-organized the program. “Unity of the People” on Siam Thai TV Station Say Plaintiff is a major NIA mainstay, rampant at accelerator committee meeting will take 5 billion baht pushing IT budget from 3 billion baht to 8 billion of baht, going to defraud the whole country. .61 The defendant gave a press conference in the Democratic Party office, similar to the plaintiff having power over the president. NIA makes people understand that Plaintiff did not respect supervisor. And it confirmed that the plaintiff ordered to add an aneurysm, which is false, and on March 12, 61, the defendant was also interviewed on the list. “Newsletter” said something like the plaintiff pushed the budget aneurysm. And intimidate 18 parliamentary officials to create an investigative committee. On March 13, 2018, the defendant also said on the show. “News” on the New 18 channel, it seems that the plaintiff is the true charisma of the NIA. Cause the plaintiff to be hurt too The defendant denied it.
Today Mr. Watchara, the defendant received bail I went to court ready to hear the verdict
While the court examines the evidence that the plaintiff, the defendant vouches for the plaintiff and prosecution witness similarly testified about being insulted. The name of the plaintiff is clearly identified. Said to be a big leg Which, according to the dictionary, means gangster or influencer Alleged the plaintiff was corrupt Intimidating a minority official AND ordered the NIA president to discredit the plaintiff As for the defendant to serve as defense evidence of the country in the face of budget corruption You can stop aneurysm declarations Criticize with honesty and fairness. Although the budget is uncertain The defendant wanted to veto.
The court found that the defendant confirmed the plaintiff. It is the plaintiff. Not a fair criticism The defendant’s action was a crime in suing.
Judge that the defendants have committed various crimes. To punish each action, it is a crime to imprisonment for 4 counts for 1 year, including a 4-year imprisonment and a fine of 4 counts 120,000 baht per fine 480,000 baht, with the testimony of the accused is somewhat beneficial, reducing the sentence 1 from every 3 to 8 months in prison for each krathong and a fine of 80,000 baht for a total of 32 months in prison and 320,000 baht of fine, with a probationary sentence of 2 years.
As for the plaintiff to claim 1 million baht, the court is of the opinion that the defendant’s action is considered a violation of the plaintiff. But considering the circumstances, the request that the plaintiff requested was too much. Therefore, the damages should be fixed at 500,000 baht with an interest of 7.5% per annum and the sentence announced in Thairath newspaper, Daily News also for 3 days.
After hearing the verdict, Mr. Watchara revealed that he accepted the judgment of the Court of First Instance. But the defendant filed an appeal with the Court of Appeal. Because it is for the public good that the defendant will ask the Superior Court for clemency
[ad_2]
