[ad_1]
Pheu Thai decided that Prayut was wrong.
At 12.20 pm on November 30, 2020 at Pheu Thai Party (PAD) Mr. Prasert Chantararawongthong Party Secretary Announced the case that the Constitutional Court made an appointment to read the decision and vote on the case General Prayut Chan-o-cha Prime Minister and Minister of Defense Using the Royal Thai Army Hospice, both withdrew on December 2 to ask for more in 3 numbers:
1. General Prayut Viola and does not meet ethical standards. Because it did not stand as a good example AND maintain the image of the government AND use privilege over others Regardless of the law of the land
2. In the event the former DTP makes a safety claim It is just a guess AND it does not appear that the agency directly responsible has been asked to take any further action. In addition, there is already a regulation of the Prime Minister’s Office. In the past, there were no indications. To be born with General Prayut
Follow the news, press follow the line fresh news
Additionally, many former prime ministers have lived in private homes. Or the Prime Minister’s hospice. It’s a house in Phitsanulok. If you’re worried about this, you can send staff to take care of it.
Mr. Prasert He said that entering the political government does not belong to the hospice and welfare regulations. Since General Prayut retired He cannot stay in the welfare house Also, in hospice terms, it is used to welcome guests. I did not live for months, years But General Prayut took over as Prime Minister Considered a political official Therefore, he does not qualify for both cases and
3. The decision of December 2, according to the Constitution of Thailand, Article 211, last paragraph, stipulates that the decision of the Constitutional Court is final. It is binding on parliaments, councils, courts, independent organizations, and government agencies, so the ruling will be the norm for retired government officials in the future. What can stay in Ban Luang Free or not
By various departments The decision should be taken into account That if the ruling indicates that it cannot survive It will affect two other ministers The party is now checking whether the two are still in Ban Luang or not.
Also in case Gen. Prayut Compared to the case of Mr. Samak Sundaravej The former prime minister who was interpreted as an employee believed that in the case of General Prayut It is about receiving benefits as a political official. When calculating the stay in Ban Luang after retirement for 5 years, the benefit will be calculated in excess of one million baht.
Considered a conflict of interest under the Constitution, Section 184 (3) and I would like to ask if General Prayut has a private home. But why are you still in Ban Luang again?
[ad_2]
