[ad_1]
SCG Muang Thong held a letter protesting the referee’s duties in the 5-event series with handball rules stating that the penalty should not be penalized.
“Khilen Pong” SCG Muang Thong United has produced a book protesting the performance of the umpire team, led by “Wiwat Champa-on” in the 2020 Toyota Thai League football game midweek. The Raiders lost to Sing Rai United 1-2 on November 18 in the past. After many strokes acting in error Has an effect on competition
For 5 events in the club He has produced a protest book consisting of
Event 1 (40.56 minutes) SCG player No. 37 Muang Thong United Pichautara received the ball on the right side of the line. Which is in front of the function area of the second assistant judge, but the second assistant judge, Mr. Wichet Ketkaew, raised the flag to be offside. What if such a blow is considered? There are 33rd players at Singha Chiang Rai United who are in a lower position than SCG’s Muang Thong United players.
Event 2 (42.19 minutes) Singha Chiang Rai United Club player number 14 Mr. Sanukran Thinjom threw Muang Thong United SCG player number 37 to fall in front of the penalty area. In the 30th minute of the match, Sanukran Thinjom received a yellow card awaiting a penalty from the referee. The club believes that the player should receive a second yellow card as a red card. And had to leave the competition As clearly stated in the Laws of the Game, the Laws of Fouls and Misconduct
Goal revealed 50:50 of the best players in the world
Incident 3 (58.24 minutes) Singha Chiang Rai Club United commits a penalty on the penalty kick where referee Mr. Wiwat Champa-on has deemed SCG Muangthong United player No. 87, Mr. Vanderley Dias Marinho, to have made a hand inside the penalty area of Muang Thong United’s SCG, who, if you look at the event, you can see that the ball has touched other parts of Mr. Vanderley Dias Marinho’s body before the ball hits the arm. The Law of the Game states that if the ball hits any part of the body (including the feet) it is not considered a hand. The club believes that the referee Including both video judges Acts seriously harmed
Incident 4 (Na 76.07) Muang Thong United SCG No. 87 player, Mr. Vanderley Dias Marinho, was knocked down by Singha Chiang Rai United players in the penalty area. But the judge, Mr. Wiwat Champa-on, did not ask to see the VAR from both the video judges and the assistant judge. Neither of them had informed the judge either.
Event 5 (minute 102) SCG’s 10th player Muangthong United was captured by a Chiang Rai club player United had a knocked down leg, giving Singha Chiang Rai United a counterattack and SCG Muangthong United club almost lost a goal from this moment. This incident occurred near the judge, Mr. Wiwat Champa-on, who could see the incident clearly. But the referee did not sanction SCG’s Muang Thong United and let the match continue.
While the list of referees in Singha Chiang Rai United – SCG Muang Thong United referee Withawat Champa-on, assistant referee 1 Chotirawee Thongduang, assistant referee no. 2 Wichet Nat Ketkaew, Judge No. 4 Chai Rerk Ngamsom, Referee VAR 1 Warinthrasadee and Judge VAR2 Suriya Lee-in
