Wattana suggests that mobs respect the rights of others. Warns that the state should not be in conflict



[ad_1]

Wattana suggests that mobs respect the rights of others. Warn the state should not be a conflict.

On November 19, 2020 at 3:53 p.m.

“Wattana” declared that the vote on the draft amendment to the Constitution was as expected. That all parties accept the change of the peaceful amendment of the constitution. Suggest that protesters should respect the rights of others. Warn the state not to act as a conflict.

On November 19, 63, Mr. Wattana Muang Suk, Leader of the Pheu Thai Party A personal Facebook post states that Parliament’s decision to adopt two unified constitutional amendments to establish a new constitutional building project did not surprise me. Because I have always insisted that our bodies requesting the establishment of a construction organization are complete and will pass. Other sketches It won’t happen until I have to argue with people in my party and my colleagues who pressured us to propose another amendment to close this and cover it. Because I saw at first that it was a waste of energy and a waste of time.

What is gratifying is that this change follows a course that will be the cornerstone of the country. As for the other five draft amendments, the majority of the elected deputies who did not vote for them did not consider it. Because I can accept.As for the protesters and dissatisfaction with the vote, I think that the protesters should respect the rights and freedoms of others as well, because if those parliamentarians vote against the sentiment of the people, both the parliamentarians and That political party will be punished by the people in the next elections.

What I will demand is We ask all parties to accept the changes that will emerge from the peaceful constitutional amendment. The constitutional amendment process has ended. There are still people trying to turn the tide to boil the locals that the two figures who passed the parliament cannot be solved, everything is distorted. Because the exclusion does not resolve Sections 1 and 2 are not principles Therefore, you can amend the amendment to allow the SSR to edit all the categories already. It is up to most of the commissioners, if they agree, they can fix everything.

But if there is still an assembly, it is the government’s duty to take care of and keep the protesters safe. Finally, the people will decide. Because if the assembly is unfair or causes problems for the majority, the participants will also reject and receive no support. But the government should not act as a rival or view the other as an enemy. Because we cannot force everyone to think the same. It’s even though I never go out to meet, but my kids go back to almost every meeting.



[ad_2]