[ad_1]
Mr. Paiboon Nititawan, SO People’s Power Party Discuss the draft constitution of the Isaw Group. Observing that It is a group that receives foreign capital That Mr. Suchart Srisang, former Supreme Court Justice Used to say that It was funded by Mr. George Soros, which made Thai people uncomfortable. Because foreign organizations support Not suitable for working in politics Especially proposing a draft amendment to the constitution. And heavier than that, the people on behalf of the Popular Party 63 are included and are the constitutional amendments that contain 10 principles of institutional reform that have been proposed by the Popular Party 63, which the proposed constitutional amendment does not prohibit. Amendments to sections 1 and 2, and allowing prosecutions to the institution What is considered unconstitutional, Section 255 and Section 6 violate the institution
Furthermore, the Constituent Assembly or SSO has been drawn up without prohibiting drug addicts, bankrupt or dishonest people and individuals from exercising their right to vote. Or in the process of revocation of the right to vote That the former executive committee of a party was dissolved He also prepared to be a senator. At the same time, there were proposals to edit the content of each section. What contradicts giving? The parliamentarians wrote the whole issue. Therefore, looking at the proposal The parliamentarians, according to the draft of the opposition and the government Already covers the intention of the constitutional amendment Confirm to vote on the draft amendments to the two versions of the constitution. He was asked to vote for the draft constitution of the Popular Party 63 or an organization that accepts foreign money such as the Isaw group.But if you love the institute, you can vote like you, which insisted on the positive vote against Project No. 7 of Amendment to the Constitution because it was against the monarchy. What is the center of the Thai mind?