[ad_1]
Outstanding news
At 0900 hours on November 17, in the Criminal Court, the Court held a hearing on the case that Prosecutor 5 was the plaintiff who was suing Mr. Amnat Insuwano or “Ball Tai” Sien Muay, a famous analyst online boxing, 37-year-old Mr. Thanong. Sak or Hin Puaman, 39, and Mr. Noppadol or Boythip Montien, 39, together are the 1 to 3 defendants, respectively, in the crime of intentionally killing others, encouraging others to commit murder. Robbery, Firearms Law, the first defendant was recovered from prison, the second and third defendants had bail
The verdict said that on April 30, 19 at night
The first defendant used an automatic carbine. Baretta brand, size 9 mm, registration No. 5033809, where Mr. Thanongsak, the second defendant, was the person who sent firearms to shoot Mr. Asada Thapnoi, 48, or Da Saphan Mai Si, famous boxer , 4 bullets The neck, body and arms died. While Mr. Asada fell, Mr. Noppadol, the third defendant, remained a savior and facilitated Mr. Amnat, the first defendant committed a crime by stealing an automatic carbine. Baretta mark, size 9mm, victim’s CAT registration 54261018 and press on Mr. Asada’s arm. Before Mr. Noppadon Will steal the gun and escape in corruption
The incident occurred in front of the Lumpini boxing stadium, Ramintra Road, Anusawari Sub-district, Bang Khen District, Bangkok.
The court found that the plaintiff and the defendant denied it. On the day of the incident at the Lumpini boxing stadium, there was a third match, a draw, a draw, and the resentful victim blamed the defendants who had been previously offended. Blaming the accused Until the seventh game, there is a challenge Exit the boxing arena and fight each other
The defense has passed away. But the deceased did not agree with the story, call the defendant who tried to avoid it. The deceased has the act of drawing a gun to shoot. Later, witnesses heard the sound of gunshots, the incident unfolded rapidly, hugging, and then another 3-4 shots were heard.
Witness near the scene confirmed that he saw the defendant 1. Use another gun to shoot the dead. With the defendants handing over weapons to He listed that the first defendant intended to kill the dead. Rather, it is an act of protection beyond the case. You must act to prevent The court then punished for killing others for 3 years for having a gun and taking a firearm for 14 months, for a total of 3 years and 14 months, but the first defendant pleaded guilty to a total of 2 years and 7 months.
As for Defendants 2 and 3, Plaintiff sued as a sponsor. But the evidence from the witnesses still cannot hear that the true fault of the lawsuit So he dismissed the lawsuit
