President Whip, the government confirms the war, has a page, sent the court to interpret the amendment to the Constitution for clarity.

Mr. Wirat Ratanaset, the president of Whip, the government rejects that the government plays on two sides, insists on having a page, sending the Constitutional Court to interpret the draft. The constitution, for clarity, the council does not stumble, it does not affect the constitution amendment process.

November 11, in the Parliament building, Mr. Wirat Rattanaset, Sen. Palang Pracharat Party (NADP) as chairman of the committee Coordinating the coalition party (wip government) that addresses the case of the parliamentarian Palang Pracharat Party To sign together with Senator to present to the Constitutional Court ruling on the constitutionality of the three reform projects to confirm that the government has a page. And who does it? Because I want to be clear. In the same way that the Constitutional Court presented in 2012, the current actions are parallel. If the Constitutional Court decides not unconstitutional, everything will go ahead. From November 17 to 18, the parliamentary meeting Continues the vote on the constitutional principle in the first agenda And believes that the resolution will be fluid Because we have coordinated with Sen. Until the understanding of the others already

When asked if the deputies of the Palang Pracharat Party are both proponents of the constitutional amendment? And presented to the court for interpretation is a mistake or not. Mr. Virat said if someone lives. Parliamentarians would understand what happened in the past, and there are many parties that express their opinions on these matters, but they are not binding. Therefore, to be clear, it must be presented to the Constitutional Court for decision. To be binding, state that it was not otherwise intended. Because if there is any other intention Probably presented to the president of the National Assembly directly And the matter should have reached the Constitutional Court But we took a parliamentary procedure. However, to pass a resolution, I personally believe that even in the future, if the Constitutional Court takes this into consideration It will not affect the constitutional amendment process Just as there is a possibility that the Constitutional Court considers It is expected to be completed before the process parliamentary.