[ad_1]
November 2, 2020
1,014
The opposition imposed 4 conditions to join the reconciliation committee, emphasizing that “the prime minister must resign first”, warning not to be selfish with the dissolution of Parliament. Compound the problem
At 12:30 pm, the opposition coalition party met to discuss the political situation. Chusak Sirinil, deputy leader of the Pheu Thai Party, said the opposition party’s position on the establishment of a reconciliation committee by the president of the National Assembly, we believe. 1. The coalition opposition parties see together that Thailand’s current problems are caused by General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense. Mainly and I just want to inherit the power. If the committee was created now, it would be useless. Therefore, we insist on the original position, General Prayut. First you have to resign the position
2. We have lessons that the committee in this situation has happened many times, but the committee has no power in itself to take any action, like amnesty or remedies, for example, so there is only one proposal. Only the government We would like to see if the committee that will be established will have power or not.
3. Before creating a committee, the country’s problems must be addressed. The opposition parties of the coalition would like to first investigate and examine what the problem is with the establishment of this committee.
4. Situation of the country If you want to solve the problem The best thing is to end the harassment of people and young people. To resolve the situation As long as the threat persists The probability that the situation will be resolved is impossible.
Chusak said that in this situation If the Prime Minister decides to dissolve the House of Representatives, the problem has not been solved. Since the constitution has not been amended Elected again, the Senate still elected the same If this is the case, the Prime Minister is selfish.
Panat Tassaneeyanont, a former attorney general and advisor to the opposition coalition task force, said the court proceedings regarding the youth rallies were carried out. It is known that 80 more recent cases have been filed to freeze protesters, in the general sense it was too much because it was the same for the same old youth rallies who wanted to see the change in demand. This use of justice is a threat. Although the assembly is a democratic right of freedom The government and the forces of order have a duty to respect But exercising power without taking into account the rights and freedoms is equivalent to not facilitating justice. It is an anomaly in the criminal process. It becomes a threat without proper law enforcement.
“If conditions for reconciliation can be established. Besides calling the prime minister to resign first, I think that the justice process is another important condition as well, which is to respect the justice process under the principles of the constitution,” said Panus.
When asked about Mr. Paiboon Nititawan’s proposal, MP The People’s Power Party list to hold a referendum on whether or not the protests should stop. How did the coalition opposition parties approach the proposal? The Prachachat Party said that the assembly was a democratic and constitutional right as long as it was a peaceful and unarmed assembly, so it would not be possible to propose to stop using the constitution. As for considering the constitutional amendment, it is felt that Congress should consider it in conjunction with Ilaw’s proposed public sector constitutional amendment project.
Rangsiman Rome, MP, the party list, said about Paiboon’s proposal that you cannot go to a referendum to suspend the rights of the people according to the constitution And the assembly is not an obstacle for the country But General Prayut Chan-o-cha , Prime Minister, is the obstacle of the country. That he never tried to build solidarity for the country. Therefore brought to the assembly. More importantly, there is another solution, namely for General Prayut to resign.
“If you don’t sacrifice it would be difficult to get out of the office,” Rangsiman said.
When asked if the coalition opposition would take any other attitude than not joining the reconciliation committee. After the prime minister insisted that he would not resign, Lieutenant Colonel Thawee said the prime minister tried to pin his hopes on a reconciliation committee that had no legal authority. He only has the duty to study and gather opinions before presenting the Prime Minister. But today, the center of the problem is in the prime minister who has caused problems for the people and feels that there is no future. On the other hand, this type of structure weakens the country but strengthens the military. In the end, setting up a committee is just a purchase. The opposition has yet to decide whether to join the reconciliation committee. Because there is no clear pattern Only the President of the Council assigned the King Prajadhipok Institute to study and establish the format
“For personal and public interests, the Prime Minister must think carefully. Even though the Prime Minister thinks there are still benefits to be involved, but we have to admit that there are many people who disagree with the Prime Minister, ”said Lieutenant Colonel Thawee.
