[ad_1]
“Paiboon” launched 52 million questions, banning political rallies for 2 years, facilitating economic solutions, Chong issued the ‘Referendum Decree’ voting on December 20, and elected the PAO Prime Minister.
On November 2, Mr. Paiboon Nititawan, MP’s list of names Deputy Party Leader Palang Pracharat, as a member of the National Assembly, said he had debated in a parliamentary meeting on October 26. He proposed a national solution to the severe political conflict in Thailand.
He proposed voting in a referendum to ask the people of the country instead of the dissolution of parliament and return power to the people to re-elect them. Because he saw that the dissolution of parliament would aggravate the economic situation by having more problems AND the dissolution of parliament could not stop the conflict of political rallies.
Therefore, I would like to propose to General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, if he finds an exit from the country to be effective. The people of the entire country must participate in the use of sovereignty to decide this important issue. Where possible He proposed to the Prime Minister that he consider that the Cabinet (Cabinet) have a resolution to hold a referendum.
For all the people of the country which has the right to vote in a referendum of 52 million people to participate directly in the decision of this important national issue. In accordance with the principle of direct democracy to reach a resolution that the majority of the people of the country Agree or disagree with the organization of a political demonstration in the current situation.
That affects the economy AND the peace and order of Thai society But there is still a legal question as to how to ask questions so that it is not prohibited by article 166 of the Constitution, which states that in case there is reasonable cause , the Cabinet will request a referendum on any matter that is not contrary or contradicts. Constitution or matters relating to any person or group of people as provided by law.
Mr. Paiboon said he would like to ask questions about the possible referendum on Section 166 of the Constitution as follows: “What do you see? If the government takes decisive legal action It is prohibited to hold political meetings that violate the law of public assembly. There is an act to violate the Constitution, Section 6, affecting the security of the Kingdom
And affecting to solve the economic problems of the country that are affected by the situation of the coronavirus outbreak. This is for the benefit of maintaining the security of the country. Public Safety Economic stability of the country
Or prevent public disasters from the nation’s people’s conflicts And provide solutions to economic problems Help heal people’s suffering, can be carried out Therefore, the government will take strict legal measures to prohibit such political gatherings by a period of 2 years from the date of the referendum “.
Paiboon said the exit from the country was by allowing 52 million people with the right to vote across the country to vote in a referendum. Agreeing or disagreeing with the question of the referendum will have final effect. If the referendum results, the majority of the votes agree with the government
When it is the resolution of the majority of the people of the country Allow the government to use absolute legal measures These political meetings are prohibited for a period of 2 years from the date of the referendum. It will stop the problems arising from political demonstrations for a period of time.
It is enough for the government to solve the economic problems, help the people to come out of the impact of the crisis of the COVID-19 outbreak. But if the majority of the people do not agree with the government measures according to the referendum question. The government does not have to take any legal action against most of the people.
Paiboon said that to hold a referendum, which is the exit from the country. It is fast and saves the country’s budget. Therefore, the referendum was proposed to accompany the elections of the PAO Council and the President of the 76 Provincial Administrative Organization on December 20, specifying an increase in the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. The Electoral Commission held only one referendum.
This will lead to a small part of the referendum budget and the exit of the country through a referendum. It is an emergency with an urgent need, therefore, The Cabinet is proposed, under article 173 of the Constitution, promulgated as an Emergency Decree (the Royal Decree) in a referendum was used only on this occasion.
Because this is the case for the benefit of maintaining the security of the country. Public Safety Economic stability of the country Or prevent public disasters and the Cabinet considers it an emergency That has an urgent need that cannot be avoided
“I believe that after a referendum it will make all the people of the country participate directly in the exercise of sovereignty. Correct the current situation This is a conflict between the people, a group of protesters calling themselves Rajat 63 has a problem with many people. With whom I disagree The Rath 63 group is increasing the conflict.
It can soon lead to violence. That no one wants to happen. Therefore, you must find a way out of the country by peaceful means. Calling for the sovereignty of all the peoples of the country through a referendum to solve important problems. Thus, he will be able to stop the great conflict in Thailand, ”said Paiboon.
[ad_2]
