[ad_1]
The court of sale of the case “Penguin” violated the jurisdiction of the court to speak, live live, persuade to attend court Just a warning Seeing that it was a major misunderstanding, a mistake And the defendant is still a student Has made a statement apologetic Therefore, prosecution is of no benefit.
At 09.00 hours on October 28, in the Criminal Court, the Court designated an investigation for violating the jurisdiction of Court number Black Sor. 9/2563 that the Director of the Administrative Office of the Criminal Court accused Mr. Mass group Pueblo liberated The accused of violating jurisdiction
From the case at 9:00 am on August 8, 2020 while Investigative Officer Samran Rat Police Station Take Mr. Anon Nampa and Mr. Panupong Chadnok or Mike 2 accused of inciting cases File a petition for arrest before the Criminal Court. He has formed a gathering of supporters In front of Mook, the stairs of the Criminal Court During that time, Mr. Prit stood up and screamed loudly. And use a camera to advertise To persuade other people To meet on the court To obstruct court proceedings Including live (live), video and audio broadcasts of the court meeting Through social media and various media By the Mr. Prit’s action Causing disturbances on the court grounds And also failure to comply with the requirements of the Criminal Court, considered misconduct in court. What is a crime of violation of jurisdiction?
Today, the court picked up Mr. Prit From the Bangkok Special Prison While detained in the Department of Corrections car, Mr. Prit went through the glass all the way to court.
Today, Mr. Anon Nampa, lawyer, Mr. Prit The defendant, who had been released from prison, said that the 22-year-old defendant was studying at the Faculty of Political Science and admitted to having delivered the statement. But without thinking he did not intend to interfere with court proceedings. And it didn’t stop as soon as the authorities banned it. But as time went on, I realized that it was an inappropriate act, insisting that I wouldn’t do it again.
Where the representative of the Director of the Criminal Court pointed out that Upon receiving the apology and the accused will not act again, the accused is not impressed.
Court of Hearing The defendant’s statement acknowledged that it was true. Misunderstandings And it was a sudden state of mind and when the accuser did not repeat the offense. And to alleviate the harmful effects, the accused made a statement of apology willing to spread the news. The actions of the defendants were only a fleeting emotion, with misunderstandings and misconceptions about the prosecution of Messrs. Anon and Panupong. When the accuser is not impressed to consider the age of education even in the Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University There is no point in prosecuting
But to maintain a trial you must maintain order in court Therefore sentenced by reprimand and the defendant to swear not to do it again And distribute the case from the following directory
Read more …
