[ad_1]
Lawyer Khai Roo apologized for the knot of the tour. After criticizing that Mike Pirat withdraws the petition, Sara-Maxwell is willing to explain all the reasons, insisting on Sara because she sympathizes with her mother who loves her son.
In the case you consider Leuang Watthanavanich, Sara Casinguin’s lawyer, criticized Mike Pirat for choosing to give money to children at the age of 20, which is considered a vital age. It poses a question in the child’s mind: And for the past 14 years, why didn’t my father raise and adopt us? Do not give money during that time. Is it out of anger at the mother who has another younger sister? Was it because he was really doing it for the child or simply because he wanted to win over the mother? That after coming out of the critique the tour ended immediately.
Read the news: Estimated Attorney, Mike Garden Post – Show the spending transferred to Sara 6 years 2.9 million!
On October 10, 2020, Facebook estimated that … “Mr. Krabai posted a message explaining that I apologize that the previous post was too harsh. Regarding the cause of Sara’s story It was out of sympathy for a mother that she loves her son so much, that she faced this situation.
He wants everyone to open up and see that both Mike and Sara are involved in raising the younger Maxwell. By dividing the duties of the father, he makes a living, earning almost 8 million children, while the mother raises the son to cultivate the habit, which is not comparable to the one that performs better than anyone else. Because each side does not perform the same duty
History that happened in the past Let it be the past It can’t fix anything Aggravating it doesn’t help. As for the reason you see Mike you shouldn’t withdraw the joint management petition. There are reasons for this.
1. Asking to certify that the child is legally valid is a good thing and should be done. Because children have parents Can be supported by both sides And can be raised in old age
2. child custody Have the parents determine the child’s address. Admonish Manage assets If there is an event that causes difficulties or happiness of the children You can determine that Father or mother or another person has unilateral custody of the minor without affecting their parentage.
Regarding the case of these two Because they were not together as husband and wife. If you use power to rule together Then there can be problems in case of disagreement Therefore, there should be only one sovereign power, Sara, because it was raised from the beginning. And it did not stop working mother As if the parents divorced Then let the child be with any party The other party has the right to visit
Therefore, the new objection is written: Sara agrees to make Mike a legitimate father. But ask that the authority of the parents fall on the mother
As for how Mike got to court, they had to talk to each other to mediate. Not withdrawing the application Because it would fail Mike’s first purpose. Including affect Maxwell’s rights AND does not make a father by law
Also, in the foster care section Mike was able to do this without the need to wait for a senior. Because on the way Children also need education. If there is a concern that the money will not reach the child’s hand Then transferred to the school Or pay directly with the insurer As has always been done
Instagram images m1keangelo
[ad_2]
