[ad_1]
“Mo Warong” led the Thai Phakdi Group to submit a list of 1,300,000 names to the National Assembly. To oppose the amendment, the constitution reiterated the 2017 constitution through a 16.8 million vote, if politicians do not listen to persistence to resolve. This event ends at the Constitutional Court.
On September 23, in parliament, Dr. Varongdej Kitvikrom, Dr. Varongdej Kitvikrom, led people to the Keeakkai intersection to bring a list of people who oppose the 2017 constitution amendment of 1,300 thousand names to submit to amend the constitution. To the President of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate Through representatives of the President of the 2 Chambers, with a sub-stage in front of Parliament also
Dr. Warong said he intends to collect more people’s names. But the opponent attacked the system to compile the group list. Therefore, he can only proceed for 4 days because he fears that the system will fail, but believes that it is enough to state the intention that the “100,000 names” of the group did not submit or oppose the law. But attaching a contact with a phone number represents the 16.8 million votes that voted in favor of accepting the 2017 constitution to oppose the constitutional amendment. By calling this activity “The work of the land” ready to invite the masses to show the “OK” sign for the media to record
And he reminded all members of Parliament that if you are still stubborn, go ahead without listening to the voice of the people. This will end with the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court rule was completed when the Council attempted to amend the 2007 constitution that the constitution approved in a referendum. Considered a constitution that was established by the people Parliament is a lower-ranking constitutional body. Therefore, it has no power to change the entire constitution. He only has the power to fix it, so “don’t waste your time. Waste of people’s money and gold Because however If you keep going, you definitely lose. People will definitely win.”
After Dr. Warong submitted a list of NCCC objections against the Constitution amendment, he posted on Facebook. Warong Dechgitvigrom That the Thai Phakdi Group has compiled a list of 130,000 people to present to Parliament. Demonstrate intent to oppose the establishment of the Senate to draft a new constitution with reasons
1. The 2017 constitution, through a referendum of 16.8 million people, considered the people as the founder of this constitution, which in the past had been ruled by the Constitutional Court. Yingluck’s term of office Amend the 2007 constitution that was also approved in a referendum. Power of Parliament You can do is edit each section. But the new sketch with the establishment of deputies. You have to hold a referendum to ask the public whether they will accept or not. Therefore, the 2017 constitution approved a referendum of the people. To configure MP. To draft a new version Therefore, having to hold a referendum to ask the public first
2. Amendment to this Constitution There is no benefit of the people, but benefit of the politicians who want to fix. How to repress the traps Including electoral formats To lead the parliamentary dictatorship Including seizing the opportunity to destroy the high institutions of the nation
3. It is not necessary. That the country will have to pay another 15 billion baht to amend the constitution for the benefit of politicians.
4. The problem of senators who have the power to elect the prime minister It is only a transitory provision The remaining time is about 3 years, it will expire. And that’s what people have in the referendum. Temporary authorization Subsequently, the Senate will be elected by various professional groups. It is difficult for political parties to intervene.
If parliament does not listen to the voices of the people, the establishment of the 2017 constitution remains stubborn to amend it for the benefit of politicians. This had to end with the Constitutional Court. And the public will definitely not agree
At the same time, he condemned Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, the head of the Faculty of Progress. That separates Thais who call their opponents conservatives Even insulted by the accusation that To destroy the institution itself Which does not correspond to reality and we see that Piyabutr has overlooked important national institutions Citing only foreign texts and principles I do not know you can compare with Thailand Included examine the institution that does not agree because it is not necessary. Because there is already a normal audit process
Read more …
