[ad_1]
Image file
23 September 20 – Mr. Wattana Muangsuk, Leader of the Pheu Thai Party Facebook posts with the following content
I was surprised that many reporters called and asked if I was going to hear the verdict. Can I accept the consequences of trials that will go wrong? As to predict a judgment in advance
In this case, I was charged with
(1) I used my power in the ministerial position to intervene in the work of the Committee and the Governor of Housing to issue the announcement dated October 14, 2005 according to my needs. But the results of the NACC investigation clearly establish that the announcement of such an announcement is to resolve the project delay. And take the correct action according to the NACC report, Document No. Jor. 251, page 46
(2) As a result of the issuance of such ad, the housing costs are damaged and the project must be purchased at a higher price. But the results of NACC’s investigation indicated that such an announcement was beneficial and did not spoil the benefit of the home. In addition, it will not cause operators to obtain additional benefits according to the NACC report, document No. Jor. 251, page 47 and
(3) I request, accept or agree to receive property or any other benefit from the operator in exchange for the approval of the construction unit and the purchase of the project from the operator. But the results of NACC’s research indicate that entrepreneurs who have the right qualifications for equity and security have been approved for every number of units requested. In addition, the Attorney General believes that the behavior of the case is that I use the domain in the form of the use of power to formulate policies. But there is no circumstance that is connected that I used my power to collect money according to the NACC report, document No. Jor 251, page 46 and according to the minutes of the meeting between the prosecutor and the NACC, document No. Jor 354 pages. 940
The results of the investigation also revealed that all housing officials acted accordingly. Construction unit approval The purchase of all projects is successful. Without any benefit To the entrepreneurs And without any harm Move to the home It appears in the document taken from the original that I published as evidence.
In a criminal case, the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff. The plaintiff had to prove in court until, without any doubt, that the defendant had committed a crime, the court convicted the defendant. The evidence I have posted is probably the answer to why I am confident in my innocence. I fought according to the court case and went to the court in every game without asking for a postponement. I believe that any criminal trial will be based on evidence. It is not in accordance with political beliefs or tendencies.
Tomorrow at 11:00 AM. You can see me in the Supreme Court.
[ad_2]
