Parina-Srinuanrod! The Constitutional Court unanimously decided the affiliation of deputies.



[ad_1]

The Constitutional Court says “Parina-Srinuan” does not have to be released by the parliamentarians in case of being called, using the position of the parliamentarians to intervene

(September 23) The Office of the Constitutional Court released decision documents In the case where the Speaker of the House of Representatives petition the State Court of Thummanoon to decide under section 82 that the membership of the members of the House of Representatives of Ms. Parina Kraikupt, the defendant, is terminated under Section 101 (7) along with Section 185 (1) AND the membership of the House of Representatives of Ms. Srinuan Boonlue , the second defendant, was canceled in accordance with the constitution. In the same section or not

The results of the Constitutional Court ruling are unanimous in ruling that the actions of Miss Parina Kraikupt The first respondent is only following the complaints of the people in Chom Bueng district. What is one area in Respondent 1’s constituency for government officials to perform functions required by law? In the event that the defendant cannot hear that the first defendant uses his or her status or position as a member of the House of Representatives, acts in a way that interferes or interferes with the performance of official duties or the performance of the duties of officials and governmental agencies. Status For their own benefit, that of someone else or that of a political party, either directly or indirectly. Members of the House of Representatives who request the first defendant are not fired by the constitution. According to the previous section

for Miss Sri Nuan Boonlue The second defendant, the Constitutional Court, unanimously ruled that the second defendant’s action was to report the problem that occurred in Chom Thong district, an area in the second defendant’s constituency, to be accepted by the Minister of Health. I only know AND do not appear other circumstances of the 2nd respondent to participate in the budgetary expenses or give their approval in the preparation of any project. From the Ministry of Public Health In the event that the second defendant cannot hear the status or position of the members of the House of Representatives act in a way that interferes or intervenes in such a way as to make him participate in budgetary expenses or Establish any project of the Ministry of Public Health for the benefit of third parties or political parties. Either directly or indirectly, the membership of the members of the House of Representatives of the second defendant is not terminated under the previous section of the Constitution.

[ad_2]