Politics – Urgent! The unanimous resolution of the Constitutional Court ruled that ‘Parina-Srinuan’ was not released from the membership of the deputies.

“Parina-Srinuan” went to the Constitutional Court with a unanimous unanimous resolution from the membership of the deputies. The reason is not yet in the scope of the use of the position that interferes with the work of the state-budget.

At 3:00 pm on September 23, 2020, the Constitutional Court sat on the throne. To read the judgments The matter that the Speaker of the House of Representatives filed a constitution request to decide under Article 82 of the Constitution that the membership of Ms. Parina Graikupta, MP of Ratchaburi, Palang Pracha Rath Party Termination of the Constitution of Section 101 (7) along with Section 185 (1) and the membership of Deputy Srinuan Boonlue terminated under Constitution 101 (7) along with Section 185 (2) or not by the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Sent to Mr. Sorasak Pienvej Secretary-General of the House of Representatives Ms. Parena and Ms. Srinuan did not attend the court, which Ms. Parena appointed Mr. Thosaphon Peng Som as their representative. S. Pichaya Jaisamut

The judiciary of the Constitutional Court Has assigned Mr. Wirun Sangthian, judge of the Constitutional Court You are a reader of Mr. Wirun’s decision Read the ruling that the Constitutional Court considered the petition Statement to resolve the accusation AND supporting documents and see that the case has sufficient evidence to determine the diagnosis. Therefore, the inquiry is not carried out under the 2018 Constitutional Court Procedure, Art. 58, first paragraph, and determines the issues to be considered as follows:

Issue 1: Miss Parena Membership Terminated under Section 101 (7) along with Section 185 (1) or not counted when

Issue 2: Membership of Ms. Srinuan Terminated under Section 101 (7) of the Constitution, along with Section 185 (2), or not counted when

The court considered issue 1, the facts of the case, heard that on October 29, 2019, Defendant 1 attended a meeting with government officials, relevant agencies, and individuals involved in the establishment of a community forest in the Chom Bueng district. , Ratchaburi province. To the meeting that would coordinate and expedite the investigation of the pertinent departments closely To expedite an area such as community forest

In this regard, considering the actions of the 1st defendant, the Constitutional Court by unanimous opinion that the actions of the 1st defendant are merely follow-up. Stories from people in Chom Bueng district area That is area in respondent 1’s constituency for government officials to fulfill functions required by law. Therefore, he was not yet able to hear whether the first respondent used the MP status or position. Acts in a way that interferes or interferes with the performance of a government service or the performance of a permanent duty of a public official. Or government agencies for the benefit of oneself, others or political parties Either directly or indirectly in accordance with Section 185 (1) of the Constitution.

Issue 2 From the facts of the case it appears that on October 22, 2019, the second defendant met with Mr. Anutin Charnvirakul, Deputy Prime Minister. And Minister of Public Health In Government House And delivered a letter notifying the accommodation problem of Chom Thong Hospital in Chiang Mai province to the Minister for recognition. Considering the actions of the second respondent by unanimous consensus, the action of the second respondent was to report the problems that occurred in Chom Thong district. What is the area of ​​constituency of the defendant, so that the Minister of State only for recognition AND no other circumstances of the respondent 2 has been involved in the budgetary expenses or has given his approval to the preparation of any project. Of the public ministry
Sook was still unable to hear that the second respondent used MP’s status or position to act in an intrusive manner or intervene in a way that allows him to participate in budget spending or give his approval. In the preparation of any project of the Ministry of Public Health for the benefit of oneself, others or political parties Either directly or indirectly According to article 185 (2) of the Constitution

Relying on the aforementioned reasons, the membership of the first defendant’s deputies is not terminated under the Constitution. 101 (7), along with Section 185 (1) and membership of deputies. The second defendant is not terminated under Section 101 (7), along with Section 185 (2)