Exciting ‘Penguin’ Reversed in Trial for Violating Jurisdiction Live Life, Arrest Day, Anon-Mike



[ad_1]

Winning the “Penguin” judicial investigation violates jurisdiction. Live “Anon-Mike” encourages people to join the assembly

The Criminal Court has carried out an investigation for violation of the jurisdiction of Court No. Black Sor. 9/2563 from the Director of the Administrative Office of the Criminal Court. Accusing Mr. Prit or Penguin Chivarak, the leader of the liberated people The accused of violating the jurisdiction

From the case at 9:00 am on August 8, 20, while the investigating officer Samran Rat Bringing Mr. Anon Nampha and Mr. Panupong Chadnok or Mike Rayong, two accused of inciting cases of expression File a petition for detention with the Criminal Court. He has formed a gathering of followers In front of the porch of the stairs leading to the Criminal Court During that time, Mr. Prit or the defendant Penguin stood up and shouted loudly. And use the camera to advertise to persuade other people Gathering in court To obstruct court proceedings Including live broadcasts (live), video and audio of court rallies through social media and various media. Defendant Prit’s Prior Actions Causing Riot on Court Grounds AND still does not meet the requirements of the Criminal Court. Considered bad behavior on the court. What is a crime of violation of jurisdiction?

Today, Mr. Prit or Penguin traveled to attend the court hearing. Ready to reveal before you go to the courtroom that you are confident that there is no action that violates the court. And he asked the court to exercise its discretion in considering the case impartially. In asking to fight this case on the facts AND I believed there was sufficient evidence to point out to the court that Live Broadcast on the Court is not considered a violation of jurisdiction. Because it was not done inside the room

While Mr. Prit’s lawyer, Krisadaang Nuttajarat, revealed that today he prepared three or four witnesses to point out to the court that Mr. Prit did not have any lese majesty intention. Or violating the jurisdiction And see if the accused party What evidence is prepared? Therefore, you still cannot determine if the investigation will be completed until the court orders today?

Read more …

[ad_2]