[ad_1]
“Parina Kraikupt” met with the NACC reported 2 accusations in the case of false property reports: Invade the forest Prepare to clarify the steps
On September 7, 2020, a news report from the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) reveals progress should the NACC launch an investigation. Mrs. Parina Graigupt MP Ratchaburi, Palang Pracharat Party (NACC) in case of knowingly presenting an account that shows false assets and liabilities Now, more than 90 percent
The NACC has already reported the allegation to Ms. Parina so that Ms. Parina can further clarify the allegations in accordance with procedure. The Organic Law to Combat Corruption BE2561
“In the case of land intrusion, it is divided into 2 parts: the resource police OR the police, the Natural Resources and Environmental Crimes Division (BMA) has referred the matter to NCCC proceed Because the resource police have considered What is the invasion of government officials
But the NACC views this as a private crime. And it is not clear if it was an act as a deputy, so the act was a personal matter. In this section, we have sent the matter back to the resource police. “ The same source said, adding that
For the case of this invasion of lands NCCC is considering ethics. That it found that there may be problems of deliberation to commit serious offenses That according to the law The NACC has a serious ethical investigation, so now the NACC has reported the accusations to Miss Parena already And if you ask it and it is discovered that there is a basis real for guilt will refer the matter to the prosecutor of the case to the Criminal Chamber for People in Political Charge of the Supreme Court.
The source said The Organic Decree for the Prevention and Repression of Corruption BE2561 (2018) under article 87, second paragraph, together with article 81, establishes that If the NCCC board examines and opines that the person holding a political office Power Constitutional Court judicial Or a person who occupies a position in an independent organization Violates or does not comply with ethical standards. To the board NCCC proposes to the Supreme Court for diagnosis. And if the Criminal Division for People with Political Positions of the Supreme Court defends the case To detain the accused in the performance of her functions until a sentence is passed. Unless the Supreme Court orders otherwise
In the event that the Supreme Court ruled that the accused committed the alleged crime To dismiss the person sentenced to evict the position of the holiday of performance of their duties. AND revoke the right of that person to stand for election AND revoke the right to vote for a period of no more than 10 years or not
“If any person is revoked the right to stand for election in any case That person does not have the right to run as a member of the House of Representatives (senators), senators (senators), members of the local assembly. Or local administrators AND no has the right to hold any political office “ The source stated
Resolution information
[ad_2]
