[ad_1]
The Criminal Court allowed the release of “Anon Nam Pha-Mike Rayong” after the Samranrat Police Station. Submit a request to cancel the detention. Due to a sufficient investigation, the two defendants were not required to be detained during the investigation.
At 4:00 p.m. on September 7, 2020, the reporter reported that in front of the criminal court The Thai Student Union (OIE), together with the Democratic Rehabilitation Group (DRG) and the Mahanakhon Group for Democracy, organized an activity calling for justice in the process of issuing an arrest warrant for democracy activists from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Movement group Security personnel From the War Veterans Organization (OTP) in court, chains were used to lock the keys at gate 8-9 when protesters began to arrive. Without a pillar In terms of police security, the Phaholyothin Police Station organized around 40 uniformed and non-uniformed officers to deal with the situation.
The officials also posted a large notice sheet from the Criminal Court. Using an amplifier or doing anything that causes annoyance is prohibited. Otherwise, it will be considered a violation of jurisdiction.
Later, at 3:20 pm, Mr. Prawet Prapanukul, lawyer, “Datapido”, former defendant in the M.112 case, brought the audio equipment in front of the court. There were approximately 30 Masses holding a sign to write a message to free Mr. Anon and Mr. Panupong. With some protesters holding portraits of the two With a call to the Criminal Court Release of Mr. Anon Nampa and Mr. Panupong Chadnok or Mike Rayong due to the withdrawal of bail before being detained in the Bangkok Special Prison. After being sentenced to revoke the bail at the request of the police. Samran Rat Police Station
Prawet said he hosted a meeting at the Phaholyothin police station on September 4. Before receiving notification that the director is absent because it is not official time Therefore they were not allowed to hold rallies Even in the notification of the assembly There is a requirement to notify the officer in advance in 24 hours, you are not instructed to notify during office hours. Therefore, the assembly is considered to have been organized, but the Phahonyothin Police Station does not accept the notice. If there is a subpoena for any case, he will contest the next case.
Later, there was a protest of young people reading Anon’s poem while holding up three fingers and yelling to let them go.
Later, at 4 pm, the rain began to fall, the protesters announced the measure.
Later, at 4:00 pm, the Criminal Court issued a press release that said As of the case on September 3, 2020, the Criminal Court scheduled a hearing at the Investigator of the Samranrat Police Station, the petitioner submitted a request for revocation of temporary release, Mr. Anon Nampa and Mr. Panupong Chadnok, both accused. As of August 4 and 20, the court issued an order allowing the arrest of both defendants and the temporary release of both defendants. With conditions that prohibit any action. Like the actions alleged in the case again After the court order, Mr. Anon and Panupong acted in violation of the court’s conditions for temporary release. Both attorneys filed an objection to the investigator’s request. After that, the court investigated the investigator’s request, the court ordered the revocation of Mr. Anon’s probation. Take the role of Mr. Panupongchad out of court to consider the age of occupation. And the circumstances of the alleged act to withdraw his temporary release should give Mr. Panupong an opportunity By stipulating additional conditions to have insurance in the amount of 2 baht without having to have collateral And for Mr. Panupong To report every 15 days, that subsequently the two defendants did not submit a request for temporary release.
Therefore, the court revoked the temporary release and accepted a court order.
Later today (September 7, 20) Investigation Officer of the Samranrat Police Station The petitioner submitted a request to cancel the detention of Messrs. Anon Nampha and Panupongchadok, both accused. By stating in the petition the reason that a reasonable investigation has been carried out, thus the two defendants are no longer required to remain in detention during the investigation.
The court considered the release of both suspects. Notifying the Bangkok Special Prison for their subsequent release.
Read more …
