[ad_1]
On November 30 at Chanasongkram Police Station, Mr. Anon Nampa, Mr. Prit Chivarak or Penguin, Ms. Panasaya Sitthichirawattanakul or Rung, Mr. Panupong Chadnok or not? Mr. Patiwat Sarai Yam or Mo Lam Bank, together with Mr. Krisadaang Nuttajarat and Mr. Norasat Na Nongtoom, lawyers from the Human Rights Law Center, met with Lieutenant Colonel Chokamuenwongboonrit, Deputy Director General (In the case of a meeting of people in the Sanam Luang area between September 19 and 20, with Pol. Pol. Pol. Att. Wit Saisueb, deputy commander-in-chief of Ngor Dor 1 attended the observation.
Prit said the lawsuit would attract more people. Because it shows that there is an injustice in the country The party will reject or accept the accusation, requesting to follow the procedure. But he insisted that he was not afraid. Let me raise the proverb that Real gold is not afraid of fire. Come use with this case
While Mr. Panupong said that he saw the use of Section 112 to report the charges after the arrest. Is it an action that can have an order in progress or not? Continue to find facts But he insisted that they do not cause them to slow down or stop their movement And confirm that this law must be repealed
Mr. Anon said that he did not place much value on this law. Because the evidence was already clear that I said what and for what purpose And ready to continue fighting in court Although I did not believe much in the justice process But it is believed that the court should consider it honestly. And the results will be released to the public to be known Because the police had requested an arrest warrant, but the court had not yet approved it. To the day of speaking honestly of the institution If we do not listen and use the law of esteem, we will continue fighting. In the next year, the content of the assembly will be heavier. Go find a container to add. Consider what will follow. Now it is good that we have seen once again the atrocity of this law.
Ms. Panasaya said that the institutional reform proposals made by citizens were aimed at reform. It’s not a subversion. But now Section 112 is being used again for activists. But believe that it will not stop the movement of citizens
The Pol. Lieutenant Colonel Attawit said today it was a subpoena. In which the defendant went to see the investigator according to the procedure When he finished recording and giving testimony Then, the investigator would be released unconditionally to his home, despite the serious charges.
[ad_2]
