[ad_1]
October 6, 2020 – Journalists report that in Ratchadapisek Road Criminal Court on October 5, the court reads the verdict on black case No. O 723/2563 in Pol. Pol. Pol. Pajaphon Rod Pho Thong Phokk. . Lat Lum Kaeo Police Station Is the plaintiff suing Mr. Khiri Rak Samana Baramee or Mit Chai, the famous hero Likai, the younger brother of Echai Mitrchai, the defendant in charge of falsely accusing others in court for committing a Criminal offense? According to article 175 of the Penal Code
The case on March 27, 2017 at the Bangkok Criminal Court The defendant has filed a false claim that the plaintiff has committed a criminal offense on the extraction of property. Under the Penal Code, Section 338 required the plaintiff to compel the signing of the loan agreement. And the contract to receive 35,500,000 baht, the defendant knows that the plaintiff did not commit a crime, but sued the court. For the plaintiff to receive criminal penalties. After the court has released the case from the system. Because the plaintiff has filed a lawsuit.
It later appeared under the judgment of the Pathumwan District Court that the defendant made the agreement voluntarily. It was not caused by threats or coercion in any way. The defendant has withdrawn a criminal case for property extraction. The fault was not caused by the accused. Because the accused accepts the condition of the crime of false report and withdraws the case for the crime of extraction of property from the plaintiff’s evidence. This is because it is the same fact as the case where the plaintiff sued the defendant in the Thanyaburi Provincial Court. To judge that the defendant had committed a crime AND the contract the defendant made Was not caused by rape or threats. The defendant sued for a property extraction crime. Therefore, not for the conviction of the accused It is not a reason for the court to punish less than what is stipulated by law or not to punish at all.
And for the benefit of the defendant’s own claim. Otherwise, the defendant can be sued to be liable for another act of perjury. Because the defendant in this case is the same person as the defendant in criminal case no. 4727/2559 of the Thanyaburi Provincial Court and red case no. 118/2563 of the Pathumwan District Court. With prison sentence Therefore, he asked the court to count the prison sentence in this case after said criminal case.
The court has considered the evidence. Convicted Defendant Guilty Under the Penal Code, Section 175 sentenced to 2 years in prison, but defendant pleaded guilty for the sake of consideration. There is a justification To halve the sentence according to article 78 of the Penal Code, one year in prison will continue from criminal case number Red No. 4727/2559 of the Thanyaburi Provincial Court and Criminal case No. 118/2563 of the Pathumwan District Court.
[ad_2]
