[ad_1]
On Monday evening, Mr. Corona Daniel Koch and Pastor Christoph Sigrist met in Zurich’s Grossmünster to talk about the corona pandemic and God for about an hour.
Not everyone in the audience is positive about Koch: A group of Corona skeptics are in the audience and are heard with loud boos.
The situation becomes dangerous after the hour-long conversation, when skeptics head to the altar and accuse the former head of the BAG’s Department of Communicable Diseases of lying. Koch remains calm and listens to the accusations for several minutes and gives an answer. After the mood turned increasingly aggressive and the skeptics barely let Koch finish speaking, he ended the conversation and left.
“Decency must be preserved”
In the Blick.ch comment column, the campaign sparked a heated discussion. Above all, the way the group appeared to Daniel Koch is criticized. On behalf of many readers, Alessandro Marchiori writes: ‘Why can’t Corona skeptics argue normally? Yelling and harassment are not arguments. They talk about freedom of expression, but prohibit other opinions. There are enough honest facts about the virus. You can discuss it normally. It just proves that the Corona skeptics are not interested in the facts, but in a dangerous move that the state no longer wants to accept. “
Reader Hanspeter Greuter sees it immediately: “You can be divided on everything, but still you must maintain decency. For some contemporaries, this is probably no longer the case today. Questioning everything, abusing people and the opinions of others are punished with contempt ”.
“Caught in your imagination”
The reader Tom Locher has a hard time understanding how much conspiracy theorists can fixate on a single issue. So he understands how such circles can be entered: “Caught in their imagination and strengthened by their ‘brothers in the faith’, they are unwilling to speak. They get information from social networks, where falsehoods and lies are spread undisturbed. “His call:” Everyone has their opinion, but relax again. “
Going back to the incident on Monday night. Like many others, Roberto Monova finds the type of action “ugly”. In his opinion, Daniel Koch is one of the reasons why Switzerland is divided into two camps and many are critical. He writes: “Koch was the one who argued as a white lie that the masks were useless, because you didn’t have them and you didn’t organize them in time. It is well known that lies have short legs, chaos is now perfect, and credibility is gone. “
Reader Remo Schmid also believes that Daniel Koch is partly to blame for such situations: “During his tenure, Mr. Koch got into contradictions. So you don’t have to be surprised if they still attack you afterwards. You have to be able to deal with it. “
So, can one speak of compensatory justice? No, thinks the reader Stephan Meier. Herr Koch didn’t deserve such a rabble! He has always acted to the best of his knowledge and belief and it was not very easy in this completely new situation. So everyone stays decent! “
On the occasion in the Grossmünster: Daniel Koch abused by crown deniers(00:42)
